This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
27 submissions to politics
21 submissions to Genomics
18 submissions to farming
9 submissions to news
2 submissions to Typogra
This user has so far shared a total of 73 links, started a total of 11 discussions and submitted a total of 736 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 354 and downvoted 129 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 1888 and downvoted 150 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Over 80 percent of Americans support mandatory labels on foods containing DNA, submitted: 7/25/2015 8:24:53 PM, 95 points (+122|-27)
The Lower Productivity Of Organic Farming: A New Analysis And Its Big Implications, submitted: 10/11/2015 6:56:19 PM, 17 points (+25|-8)
Going Forward, submitted: 6/13/2015 3:06:52 AM, 16 points (+16|-0)
Marco Rubio on the gay marriage ruling: We live in a republic and must abide by the law, submitted: 6/28/2015 11:26:04 PM, 14 points (+16|-2)
Class-Action Suit Alleges Chipotle's GMO-Free Campaign Is Deceptive, submitted: 9/3/2015 8:20:11 PM, 13 points (+14|-1)
5 lowest rated submissions:
Breitbart Staffers Believe Trump Has Given Money To Site For Favorable Coverage, submitted: 8/15/2015 3:19:28 PM, -3 points (+1|-4)
Why were so scared of GMOs, according to someone who has studied them since the start., submitted: 9/4/2015 10:16:43 PM, -2 points (+1|-3)
Were not losing plant genetic diversity after all, submitted: 9/4/2015 10:19:55 PM, -1 points (+2|-3)
GMOs are Still the Best Bet for Feeding the World., submitted: 7/22/2015 11:12:53 PM, 0 points (+6|-6)
Should Babies Have Their Genomes Sequenced?, submitted: 7/17/2015 8:35:56 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)
3 highest rated comments:
AgriGrunt 7 points 43 points 50 points (+50|-7) ago
Why are we celebrating the fact that this man is rich? Just because he is rich does not mean he is above being influenced by others. It is absurd to suggest that just because someone is rich that they are a more moral individual. The entire premise rests on people accepting that exceedingly rich people are better able at decision making and moral calculus.
AgriGrunt 1 points 33 points 34 points (+34|-1) ago
Of all the things that Reddit mods have ever done, and maybe will ever do, the act of using Mr. Rogers' name in such a terrible fashion is unacceptable. I know I am more of a traditionalist than the majority of Reddit and Voat users, but the name of somebody who had such a profound positive influence on so many should be above an personal beneficial use. A great man held that name, and the name and legacy should be protected and respected.
3 lowest rated comments:
AgriGrunt 21 points -10 points 11 points (+11|-21) ago
Downvote for bleeping on Voat.
AgriGrunt 12 points -5 points 7 points (+7|-12) ago
What? I am sorry but there is no chance of Trump willing the Republican nomination let alone the presidency. Trump only works when elect-ability is not a central voting decision for primary voters. I expect Trump won't be the top after autumn let alone the winter. Keeping a large group of people very angry over a long period of time is very hard. Trump simply lacks the proper charisma to do it.
AgriGrunt 7 points -4 points 3 points (+3|-7) ago
The reason that Monsanto has about 30% of the GM seed market cornered is because they are one of the few only companies big enough to sufficiently recover from attacks by radicals. Many testing fields are salted and pulled by radicals and everyone hates Monsanto but cannot tell a full reason why. It is always, "they patient DNA' or 'they sue farmers,' but no one can ever really say what that means. Uninformed opinions seems to trump any amount of information so long as your have a strong opinion about the counter.