Profile overview for Aethos.
Submission statistics

This user made no submissions.

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 0 discussions and submitted a total of 17 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 21 and downvoted 0 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 200 and downvoted 0 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

5 lowest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

I like how industrious, civilized nations have been dumping millions in charitable donations to shit hole countries for decades, and now we have to let all those asshole come live with us. submitted by SkrutinizeYou to whatever

Aethos 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago

The Green Revolution (ie modern agriculture) did us no favors in that regard. It kicked the can down the road. Without forward thinking, it's allowed millions of humans to be born as charity cases who have no idea how to feed themselves.

It is bad enough with Whites or an Asian culture, but Sub-Saharan Africans are the least able to fight the Iron Law of Population. They, in their millions, have nothing to lose by cannibalizing the West. They are doomed to famine and suffering anyway, so why not eat the hand that feeds them?

Malthus was right. Population can increase geometrically, while food and water supplies won't. A grim future is upon us.

Almost just had to fight a coworker. submitted by ReeceHolland to whatever

Aethos 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago

This is the perverse result of an old time lie: old american families would have anecdotes about having married an indian back on the frontier to subtly virtue signal that theirs was an old, established american family. Those same people's descendants now use the same family tale to virtue signal about having Indian blood. Go figure.

3 lowest rated comments:

Fahrenheit 2018: Amazon Begins Banning Controversial Books submitted by Bad-R0nald to books

Aethos 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

They aren't an oligarchy for "regular" books. Not even close.

Thank goodness, I would shudder to think what would happen then.

Account Deleted By User submitted by BushIsAJew to politics

Aethos 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

You:

The civil war had absolutely nothing to do with Jews.

Me:

Order 11

You:

Isolated war profiteering means Jews did the civil war?

Hardly. I never said Jews 'did' the civil war. I was objecting to your assertion that Jews were not involved. They certainly were in those states. They certainly were involved in the confederacy, as the majority of slaveowners were Jews. And, in keeping with the general premise that all wars are bankers wars, they were likely involved in financing both sides of the war, with the goal of establishing a central bank in the US regardless who won.

Account Deleted By User submitted by BushIsAJew to politics

Aethos 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

You know very well my statement that Jews had nothing to do with the civil war was in response in to the ridiculous claims of the OP about them starting the war.

I don't know what you mean unless you state it unambiguously.

Jews were not the majority of slave owners, you just pulled that from your ass:

Actually I mis-remembered. Jews were the majority of slavedealers. I apologize for remembering wrong.

they were likely involved in financing both sides of the war

Completely baseless remark.

Really? Is it though? Jews have been heavily involved in finance since medieval times, and are heavily involved in finance in modern times. Is assuming the status quo during the interim wrong?