Profile overview for 234134124123.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

3 submissions to whatever

2 submissions to TheDonald

1 submissions to Identitarian

1 submissions to MeanwhileOnReddit

1 submissions to NBA

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 8 discussions and submitted a total of 56 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 116 and downvoted 0 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 145 and downvoted 0 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

Basically a documentation of how I became "racist", submitted: 9/18/2017 1:13:08 AM, 17 points (+18|-1)

r/politics has 4 threads on their front page attacking the Seth Rich story., submitted: 5/23/2017 9:42:43 PM, 10 points (+11|-1)

r/politics has 7 threads on their front page attacking the Seth Rich story., submitted: 5/23/2017 11:41:37 PM, 6 points (+6|-0)

When do the Fake News Awards start?, submitted: 1/17/2018 10:52:49 PM, 6 points (+6|-0)

Game Two: Cavaliers v. Celtics GAME THREAD, submitted: 5/20/2017 3:07:10 AM, 3 points (+3|-0)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Ranking Anchors Thread, submitted: 5/24/2017 1:55:24 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)

Francis Bacon: writing on the state of academia, submitted: 7/23/2017 5:57:36 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)

Game Two: Cavaliers v. Celtics GAME THREAD, submitted: 5/20/2017 3:07:10 AM, 3 points (+3|-0)

Missing Sessions meme, submitted: 1/12/2018 7:40:50 PM, 3 points (+3|-0)

When do the Fake News Awards start?, submitted: 1/17/2018 10:52:49 PM, 6 points (+6|-0)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

i might catch shit for this....but what is going on with the NONSTOP sister/brother /mom /stepson porns? wtf? are guys really getting off to this? submitted by bourbonexpert to AskVoat

234134124123 2 points 34 points (+36|-2) ago

Basically, you make the porn, and then upload it. If you upload it with the title "18 year old fucks and sucks" then you're at the mercy of the search results. If you title it "stepson/daughter/mom/dad rails teenage old step(something)" you now get all the views you would have gotten, plus the entire incest festish community.

The video is pretty much the same, with some shitty dialogue added for the incest people. They customized it by just changing the title...

Same with the cuckold shit. Really easy to toss a guy in the background or on the phone, pan to them a few times, and you've got a cuckold video...

Easy way to capture a niche that wouldn't have been there without some tailoring...

Voat needs an Angel submitted by PuttItOut to announcements

234134124123 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago

Is there a "gold" for Voat? If so, I'm happy to start dishing out a couple today. The only reason I never did gold on reddit was that I didn't want to give money to trash.

But I have gold to give here, for damn sure.

Women Hold $833 Billion of the Country's $1.3-trillion Student Debt submitted by stirlatez to news

234134124123 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago

Next up, convince politicians to allow them to discharge this debt. At the expense of men.

No need. The institution of marriage does that for us. Remember that marrying one of these women means their debt is your debt!

Remember when guys got paid a dowry to take a woman in and provide for her?

It's opposite world...

3 lowest rated comments:

if /r/the_donald is destroyeed submitted by tbqh to TheDonald

234134124123 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago

Whenever anyone complains about censorship on Reddit, some obnoxious SJW gets all smug and tells them to STFU because censorship isn't illegal because Reddit isn't a government. They consciously neglect any other aspect except the legality, because that's the only thing they can defend. Censorship of political speech in a forum that holds itself out as neutral and inviting is manipulative, and authoritarian.

Reddit represents the first excursion of the mainstream media into the subliminal world of "user" based content. The quotations around the word "user" is based on so many wretched tactics that have been employed, and which have yet to be deployed. Unless we want to grant the propaganda wing of the Democrat party a new and powerful tool for social control, Reddit must be destroyed if they elect to silence r\the_donald.

They're going to bitch about how we should just stick with voat and "live and let live". No. If you use censorship to corner a marketplace of ideas numbering in the tens of millions of people, those booted off have a right to make their absence be felt. After all, censorship is legal... end of discussion, right.

Tactics:

  1. Be liberal in your use of accounts. Once taken, account names are never available again. Everyone wants an account with a cool name... won't be possible on reddit if we use keywords and limit the numbers on our spamming accounts. Also, they can only ban one account at a time.

  2. We pick certain specific times and places to channel our attacks to cause the most effect. The goal is to make certain places unusable for short but extended periods of time. Like a ddos attack but with account activity. I'm thinking a reasonable goal is 1.5 hours of concentrated fuckery. Obviously there are benefits of a constant barrage, but we can trust that this will be in addition to that. They need to know that 10k people at any one time can obliterate their sub for more than 10 minutes.

  3. Choose our targets deliberately. r\politics is 24/7, we could try rotating other subreddits in and out.

  4. We will have to be deliberate in how we post and how we vote. Voting can be done with impunity, so I think it's useful. Remember, upvotes can be just as effective. A sub can be taken down by upvoting irrelevant bs just as easily as downvoting the popular shit. Imagine r\pics full of terrible pictures... so like today but even worse. Keep in mind that they'll probably turn off downvoting after a few initial hits, so upvoting will need to be incorporated. Keep a bevy of accounts, I'm thinking 5 or 6 just for this.

  5. Make the accounts now. They might suspend new account creation or put new rules in place for their use so get them up and running with around 20 or so Karma so they can be active.

  6. Posting will be a more complicated endeavor, it would need to be kept up long enough to be disruptive, even with the banning.

  7. This is the most important. We fuck with them, and they'll get the bright idea to try and crash voat as well. This site is really fragile... We need multiple offshore forums to coordinate. I'm thinking 4chan, 8chan, and maybe some friendly gaming forum platforms.

Alright I'm home from work time for another red pill thread. submitted by Rainy-Day-Dream to TheDonald

234134124123 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago

Thought I would just respond to this one...

This is the source cited for the 1% statistic: http://www.pewforum.org/2009/01/30/income-distribution-within-us-religious-groups/

Following that, you can also look at this: http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/income-distribution/

This is fairly simple data to understand. It says that 44% of Jewish income earners make $100,000+.

That's a high number, for sure.

But 100k doesn't cut it for inclusion in the top 1%.

Here is what the top 1% of each state's respective income earners make. You'll notice that literally every state's top 1% income earners make more than 100k.

Here is a Wikipedia article, showing the lowest salary for each percentage of the population. You'll notice that making 100k puts you in the top 15% of income earners.

Equating a bare 6 figure income with being in the top 1% is ridiculous.

Alright I'm home from work time for another red pill thread. submitted by Rainy-Day-Dream to TheDonald

234134124123 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago

Top 1% of income earning families make $465,626 per year.

Making $100k doesn't get you there.

Again, I'm not attacking the rest of this, but you're cramming a bunch of people into the top 1% that shouldn't be there.