Profile overview for thewebofslime.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

1154 submissions to newswhatever

225 submissions to news

221 submissions to thewebofslime

200 submissions to politicalnews

153 submissions to ConspiracyWhatever

This user has so far shared a total of 2825 links, started a total of 64 discussions and submitted a total of 669 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 5495 and downvoted 22 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 1164 and downvoted 23 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

Brazil's New President Eliminates LGBT Office on First Day in Office, submitted: 1/12/2019 2:33:21 AM, 519 points (+521|-2)

50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat, submitted: 1/17/2019 5:56:18 PM, 297 points (+305|-8)

Mass Shooters have used credit cards to buy guns. It's time to ban credit cards., submitted: 12/24/2018 6:19:56 PM, 226 points (+231|-5)

President Trump signs the Farm Bill making dog and cat meat illegal in the United States, submitted: 12/26/2018 10:22:21 PM, 222 points (+226|-4)

Study: Obama's Common Core 'Worst Large-Scale Educational Failure in 40 Years', submitted: 12/5/2018 8:18:35 PM, 218 points (+222|-4)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Schumer: Trump Risking Government Shutdown With 'Temper Tantrum' Over Border Funds, submitted: 12/9/2018 6:59:52 PM, -7 points (+2|-9)

A few downvoat brigaders?, submitted: 12/13/2018 8:51:17 AM, -7 points (+5|-12)

Newly-Released MKUltra Docs: The CIA Made Remote-Controlled Dogs With Brain Surgery, submitted: 12/13/2018 4:06:41 AM, -5 points (+1|-6)

This Time, Will Trump Make Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers Interior Secretary?:, submitted: 12/17/2018 4:09:45 AM, -5 points (+1|-6)

Spain's Ponce Becomes First Transgender Woman to Compete in Miss Universe, submitted: 12/17/2018 3:39:19 AM, -4 points (+1|-5)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

DMCA from Black Rifle Coffee Company® submitted by PuttItOut to Voat

thewebofslime 0 points 63 points (+63|-0) ago

FIRST NOTICE THEIR TWITTER HANDLE DOES NOT MATCH BECAUSE TWITTER WON'T LET THEM CLAIM USERNAMES: @blckriflecoffee

Object, always. Every single time. (In this case, also mention that the account already voluntarily removed material in question.) I hope that fellow users, here, also take to social media to let them know we don't appreciate frivolous DMCA abuse.

Have a standard template for objection.

Check out Facebook's policy:

Usernames are generally claimed on a first-come, first-served basis. This means that you may see a Facebook Page or profile that includes your trademark in its username. While there may be cases where this type of use can be reported for trademark infringement based on the context of its use, please note that not every use of your trademark in a username is necessarily a trademark infringement. The same word used in a different context may not violate your trademark.

Someone else may use a copyrighted mark on any social media platform as a username if there is no attempt to confuse consumers. If an account has had no updates, no profile image, and there is no intent to mislead, it typically means there’s no name-squatting or impersonation.

Affirmative Defense #1: They did not "consider" Fair Use applicability before sending the notice. Black Rifle Coffee Company failed to actually consider whether this qualified as fair use or not and, instead, had a knee jerk reaction at seeing a close facsimile, but not exact replication, of their company name. Instead, they had a "knee jerk" reaction.

Affirmative Defense #2: The account was not a misrepresentation, but merely a similar username and usernames are not copyrighted.

Affirmative Defense #3: The account did not post any infringing material.

Affirmative Defense#4: Since Black Rifle Coffee Company did not take into consideration legally required issues before sending the DMCA, the DMCA notice they initiated was, ITSELF, A MISREPRESENTATION, and therefore, Voat is entitled to tany legal fees that arise from their misrepresentation of the issue.

Affirmative Defense #5: Doctrine of Laches applies here, since they already had a reddit username of the same spelling, BUT DELETED IT because of the bad publicity the account gave. This happened OVER A YEAR AGO.

Affirmative Defense #6: Since they ALREADY ABANDONED THE SAME USERNAME on another social media platform over a year ago, they explicitly communicated intent to abandon on an almost identical platform.

Affirmative Defense #7: Black Rifle Coffee is selectively applying their poor interpretation of the law to target Voat, specifically, and has failed to achieve any results of a similar request ON ANY OTHER PLATFORM.

A copyright holder who pays lip service to the consideration of fair use by claiming it formed a good faith belief when there is evidence to the contrary is still subject to Section 512(f) liability.

Here is what youtube says:

"It is our position that in general use of a string of characters or group of words in a username that happens to be used as a trademark in some market by another party is not infringement. In almost all cases the use is not a commercial use in the meaning of trademark law, and does not cause confusion. Further, to the extent that most trademark claimants have not used their marks in a market or for services overlapping YouTube, the YouTube user has priority regarding that name within our market.

Want to advertise on VOAT? Just send in a DMCA request, your name will be all over the front page. submitted by Locked_Account to whatever

thewebofslime 0 points 42 points (+42|-0) ago

Actually, they had to pay a shill company to post hundreds of pictures of dogs to bury our commentary. Check their twitter.

I'm looking for anything and everything that demostrates that Jordan Peterson is a subversive shill. submitted by draaaak to whatever

thewebofslime 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago

He is a Tavistock lackey that specializes in the manipulation of basic assumptions. His location and the people who taught him were also of Tavistock and Freud's "International Association of Psychologists".

They use "system psychodynamics" combined with "social dreaming" (they are kind of the same thing, one just has a more occult connotation) whereby they use Wilfred Bion's "basic assumption theory" and act up it in order to effect mass persuasion. You can see in the study "Some Principles of Mass Persuasion" that it boils down to the same way you would sell a tap app.

You trigger dopamine receptors and provide the motivation for people to learn where to tapp, when you have programmed intellectual and emotional triggers into them, they seek a dopamine reward when you take it away and give it back randomly in order to circumvent the more rational processes in the front of the brain. They are activating your hypothalamus and keeping it busy so people become easy to program and easy to predict. The goal is to have a persistent shave off of the group average IQ.

Most people are capable of being thinkers, but the seeking behavior of the dopamine reward has become so easy that people increasingly having lives where they engage in mindful thinking less and less.

Either way, the idea behind the machine... the way you buy in... is you have a cult. Followers. It doesn't matter if it is religious, occult, musical, social, sports, guns... whatever. As soon as you align yourself to a cult, each issue can be jacketed along the lines of the cult's controller.

So, now that you like guns, you also have to like... A B C or D. At least... that's what they try. Everyone likes guns once they fire them and become a quasi ok shot.

Or, if you watch Oprah, you also believe in A B C or D.

Each issue can be jacketed with your ideology and the votes are now easy to predict, so you know how many handfuls you need to tip the scale in each election. You also know how to take the fight out of them with crappy diets, porn and a host of other things that are specifically to alter your cognitive system and making you more malleable.

He is a shill for the institute of psychology in a way that might be described as "controlled opposition." He is an MK Ultra Ayn Rand, which is useful for conservatives to align with, solidly anti-communist, and remarkably safe. Attacking "too PC" is a great way to use people's natural sense of injustice to seem rational which is really the whole purpose of the Luciferian left. It just shocks me how many people are susceptible to falling for the Luciferian left because, next to them, Jordan Peterson seems like he has a fine set of solutions.

But that's how it all works. The arguments only need to be different enough to be talked past. Democrat? Promise social services. Create the basic assumption that people need social services. NEVER decide a good way to make those services happen, because then you aren't needed anymore. Republican? Promise less taxes. EVERYONE wants less taxes. NEVER does anyone try for both... which is totally possible. (Imagine if we just stopped handing money out to half the world to bribe their politicians to shill for the US?)

The entire goal is for everyone to be triggered and impassioned, but with 50/50 on every issue, nothing ever actually gets done. That's why figuring out what you believe and then manipulating it is very important. Most people are parrots. Nobody does any research themselves because that is a luxury. Literacy is a luxury. Literacy and tech savvy enough to look it all up is a luxury. The new privilege is access to information in the age of information overload. The new privilege is literacy in language and in tech. The new way true literacy gets applied is by telling the truth on all these manufactured factions.

Which is... Jordan Peterson is a Tavistock baby.

3 lowest rated comments:

A few downvoat brigaders? submitted by thewebofslime to ProtectVoat

thewebofslime 7 points -6 points (+1|-7) ago

errday indeed

A few downvoat brigaders? submitted by thewebofslime to ProtectVoat

thewebofslime 6 points -6 points (+0|-6) ago

I'm not. That simple.

It's simply because I posted that many articles because I am a speed reader who databases EVERYTHING as I go.

If I was a bot how is it possible that I provide this response this quickly to your comment?

A few downvoat brigaders? submitted by thewebofslime to ProtectVoat

thewebofslime 6 points -5 points (+1|-6) ago

I don't bot Voat.

So, if that s your assertion; YOU ARE WRONG.

How do explain my ability to reply immediately?

Edit: Honestly, go fuck yourself. I give zero shits about your response. The proof is as plain as day. I* am able to give a human response all the god damn time. Two years I've been putting up with your type of bullshit. Go fuck yourself.