This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
26 submissions to MeanwhileOnReddit
22 submissions to AskVoat
14 submissions to whatever
12 submissions to ideasforvoat
6 submissions to news
This user has so far shared a total of 60 links, started a total of 60 discussions and submitted a total of 1632 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 2230 and downvoted 290 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 5420 and downvoted 1881 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Orwell's "1984" acurately describes modern-day life and culture in China to a T. Goes without saying "References to George Orwell's novel '1984' are also forbidden", submitted: 1/6/2019 3:18:00 AM, 179 points (+184|-5)
Australian Government Contractors Will Now Go to Jail for Reporting Child Abuse in Detention Centers, submitted: 6/28/2015 3:57:24 AM, 159 points (+160|-1)
How would you react if a sitting president said "We need a way to remove dissenting opinions from the internet?", submitted: 10/17/2016 3:13:53 AM, 157 points (+160|-3)
Hufpo gets trolled into admitting they're an ultra racist rag, submitted: 4/16/2017 4:28:13 AM, 139 points (+139|-0)
User suggests blocking some ad domains at router level. Mods respond by deleting 23k upvoted post. Top commenters suggest alternate blocklists without specifying they also block "unpleasant content", submitted: 1/25/2019 7:10:50 AM, 110 points (+112|-2)
5 lowest rated submissions:
Downvote this shit: https://voat.co/domains/i.redd.it, submitted: 12/17/2018 6:39:00 AM, -7 points (+3|-10)
Remove NSFW tag, submitted: 3/25/2018 4:18:58 AM, -5 points (+4|-9)
You have encountered a Genie. The Genie grants you one wish. However this is a skeptical Genie..., submitted: 7/9/2018 3:41:15 AM, -4 points (+1|-5)
When voting on any post or comment, require the user to first specify why they're up or down voting. Then show stats about these voting patterns on target post or comment, submitted: 12/1/2016 7:02:45 AM, -4 points (+2|-6)
[US] Is there a point to the 2016 presidential election?, submitted: 9/21/2015 1:43:12 AM, 0 points (+2|-2)
3 highest rated comments:
something_went_wrong 0 points 74 points 74 points (+74|-0) ago
We understand that this might make some of you worried about the slippery slope from banning one specific type of content to banning other types of content.
Oh no worries about any slippery slope at all...
something_went_wrong 0 points 44 points 44 points (+44|-0) ago
This isn't news related. But what is news related is that here is a Washington Post hit piece on PizzaGate directly linking to the post spez altered.
3 lowest rated comments:
something_went_wrong 7 points -6 points 1 points (+1|-7) ago
This is being blown way out of proportion. Secretary of State doesn't even deal with classified information. That position has no requirement for understanding intelligence classification policies, let alone the archaic "alphabetic order" classification alt-right agenda-pushing fascist like you claim.
- Serves as the President's principal adviser on U.S. foreign policy;
- Conducts negotiations relating to U.S. foreign affairs;
- Advises the President on the appointment of U.S. ambassadors, ministers, consuls, and other diplomatic representatives;
- Personally participates in or directs U.S. representatives to international conferences, organizations, and agencies;
- Negotiates, interprets, and terminates treaties and agreements;
- etc, etc
Woops. Oh shit. Well, let me repeat it louder this time so you'll believe me: duties would never even touch classified intel. Prove it...
Edit: Dear lord, people. This was sarcasm.