Profile overview for qwop.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

55 submissions to Conspiracy

53 submissions to politics

19 submissions to whatever

11 submissions to science

6 submissions to news

This user has so far shared a total of 169 links, started a total of 0 discussions and submitted a total of 479 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 1996 and downvoted 143 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 1846 and downvoted 321 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

Dear Acosta ..., submitted: 11/11/2018 12:50:01 AM, 443 points (+446|-3)

Putin on homosexuals: gender identity brainwashing is prohibited in Russia., submitted: 6/12/2018 10:42:11 AM, 381 points (+385|-4)

About those Geoengineering plans ..., submitted: 11/25/2018 12:24:16 AM, 342 points (+343|-1)

Fucking white people and their ....., submitted: 5/12/2018 7:12:26 PM, 287 points (+291|-4)

Austria plans to shut down mosques, expel foreign-funded imams, submitted: 6/8/2018 9:58:34 AM, 236 points (+236|-0)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Trump is Bibi's Shabbos Goy, submitted: 4/10/2017 7:07:32 PM, -3 points (+3|-6)

Orlando Shooting - Green Screen Fakery , submitted: 6/23/2016 4:17:36 PM, -2 points (+1|-3)

Photographer sneaks into Fukushima exclusion zone - "I can feel a burning sensation in my eyes and a thick chemical smell", submitted: 7/15/2016 4:59:48 PM, 0 points (+3|-3)

New v.a.c.c.i.n.e.s will permanently alter your DNA. What could possibly go wrong?, submitted: 2/22/2017 2:56:10 PM, 0 points (+3|-3)

Cornell Faculty Refuse to Defend GMO Crops, submitted: 10/5/2016 9:10:12 AM, 0 points (+1|-1)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Reddit refugees, Why did you find censorship of others acceptable? submitted by plankO to AskVoat

qwop 0 points 46 points (+46|-0) ago

Using the word "toxic". Reddit snowflake confirmed.

Account Deleted By User submitted by DANKGHIDORAH to programming

qwop 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago

C++ is a strongly typed language, meaning in general you need to declare the type of things (int, float, string, void) before using them.

Declaring a function with a return type of void is just a way to tell the compiler that this is a function that is not supposed to return any value. That way the compiler can potentially introduce optimizations to your code, and also warn you of cases when you would accidentally do something like my_variable = function_that_returns_void();. In a case like this the compiler knows function_that_returns_void() is not supposed to return anything (if you declared it void when you wrote it), and can therefore tell you the code you just wrote is invalid.

In the original C-language you were allowed to declare functions without declaring the return type. The compiler would then assume automatically that this function is supposed to return an integer. Today in C++ functions MUST always declare the return type in advance (unless you explicitly allow undeclared types with special compiler settings). This ensures better type safety and consistency across your code.

So in order to always declare the return type of all your functions, you have to declare a function that returns nothing to be of type void.

Hope that helps. If not, ask and I'll try and clarify further.

Bill Whittle absolutely destroys your below-average snowflake on gun-control! submitted by TrumpTheGodEmperor to whatever

qwop 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago

Upvoat for not using absolutely destroys as clickbait.

3 lowest rated comments:

Neonatal exposure to a glyphosate [Roundup] based herbicide alters the development of the rat uterus submitted by HenryCorp to science

qwop 4 points -2 points (+2|-4) ago

I don't see what's wrong with this submission? Yes it's a paywall, but you can read the abstract and it's new information. Does /v/science forbid paywalls somehow? Why are people so hysterical here about this submission? I don't get it.

Attention CTR Shills submitted by antiliberalsociety to whatever

qwop 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago

By supporting mandatory anything from Big Pharma, you are supporting medicine by gunpoint.

It's already in the works. You will have law enforcement look at you and determine "you look unwell", and forcibly medicate you. This is all paid by the taxpayer of course, with no liability to Big Pharma.

Mandatory vaccinations are just a gateway excuse for Big Pharma to implement widespread gunpoint medicine.

So before you go supporting mandatory Big Pharma control of your body, I hope you think twice about the long-term implications.

Trump, Richard Nixon, Watergate. A Pattern Emerges. submitted by qwop to politics

qwop 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago

What's the problem? You're just butthurt because my previous post doesn't fit your medical pharma ivory dream tower, or are you going to contribute something here?