Profile overview for nomorereddit.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

3 submissions to fatpeoplehate

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 3 discussions and submitted a total of 31 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 8 and downvoted 1 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 21 and downvoted 0 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

Fat Privilege, submitted: 8/2/2015 6:55:56 AM, 69 points (+74|-5)

Damn. You. All., submitted: 6/20/2015 6:46:19 AM, 56 points (+57|-1)

To lurkers: Why we hate, submitted: 6/23/2015 3:47:40 AM, 52 points (+52|-0)

5 lowest rated submissions:

To lurkers: Why we hate, submitted: 6/23/2015 3:47:40 AM, 52 points (+52|-0)

Damn. You. All., submitted: 6/20/2015 6:46:19 AM, 56 points (+57|-1)

Fat Privilege, submitted: 8/2/2015 6:55:56 AM, 69 points (+74|-5)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Fat Privilege submitted by nomorereddit to fatpeoplehate

nomorereddit 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago

Uh-oh, everybody getting a downvote. Somebody's fee-fees got hurt.

Reality star admits obeast former self was a monster. Welcome shitlord! submitted by LikeJesusButTaller to fatpeoplehate

nomorereddit 1 points 15 points (+16|-1) ago

Must have made a lot of money as a reality star to be able to afford new genetics and have the "condition" removed. Cause we all know this couldn't have happened with proper dieting and exercise....

The most accurate pie chart ever. submitted by FinallyLeftReddit to fatpeoplehate

nomorereddit 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago

I haven't ever had a conversation with a fellow male where one even hinted at liking "curvy" over fit.

So, no, not the most accurate pie chart ever. Real men would not be represented on that pie chart.

3 lowest rated comments:

Need to rant. Aka today marks the day I am going to be a full blown shitkady. submitted by Breadbox743 to fatpeoplehate

nomorereddit 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

First of all, I hear ya.

Was she nice when not obese? Or is this just a continuation of her attitude. In which case, yeah pretty much you invited that treatment.

Welcome to the dark side. Enjoy your stay.

If I could I would only fly with this airline ... Samoa Air is charging passengers per kg instead of per seat submitted by savageslav to fatpeoplehate

nomorereddit 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

Thanks for the detailed reply but it didn't really address the issues I hinted at. This Samoa airline has something like ten planes, don't think any that carry more than 19 passengers (most were 172s so that's three at most), and flies to maybe a half-dozen places. I'm guessing things are pretty laid-back and that check-in and boarding are done at the same place and that weighing a few passengers isn't really slowing anything down.

"The scales will be at the ticket counter where you show up with your bags". There are a couple of reasons that will not work at US airlines with hundreds if not thousands of passengers at an airport at a given time:

  • Online check-in and bag drop is becoming a bigger thing, interaction with airline personnel are being reduced to mere seconds if not completely eliminated, so to do so would really gum up the works.
  • People are both sneaky and do idiotic things. Make somebody weigh everything at check-in, they are going to have somebody else hold their carry-on while they check-in or just stash it somewhere, causing "unattended bag" security drills every five seconds. And because the airlines don't want to be the bad-guy and don't enforce carry-on limits, much of the traveling public has all of their baggage as carry-on in however many pieces they can drag. So now to add to the problem there is a potential w&b discrepancy to add to the mix if the airline trusts the figures from the scales to calculate (I realize that currently they are only estimating already).

So I don't believe placing them at check-in can work logistically, economically, or in reality. They would have to be at the point people are getting on the plane without being able to add things. That means the boarding gate. With airlines trying to constantly get down to LUVs 25 minute turn time, and guessing that it would take at best twenty seconds per passenger to get on the scale, make sure billing info is set, note the weight, etc.. vs the current five seconds per passenger to scan a boarding pass, 100 passengers = 25 extra minutes (if I did my math right) which ain't happening. Not to mention adding scales at each gate. And making sure they are calibrated on a regular basis. And what happens when one breaks? So at the gates ain't happening either.

Don't get me wrong, I think this is a fantastic concept, just not one I can visualize being adapted by major airlines anytime in the near-future.

If I could I would only fly with this airline ... Samoa Air is charging passengers per kg instead of per seat submitted by savageslav to fatpeoplehate

nomorereddit 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

Maybe a voluntary system would work. Have a published fare, with a partial-refund given if one volunteers to get on a scale at the airport. Could keep luggage and carry-on out of the equation for simplicity (a separate large issue).