Profile overview for ledbetter.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

5 submissions to GreatAwakening

4 submissions to theawakening

2 submissions to AskVoat

1 submissions to CookingWithGoats

1 submissions to CriticalThinking

This user has so far shared a total of 7 links, started a total of 6 discussions and submitted a total of 1293 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 379 and downvoted 339 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 249 and downvoted 167 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

Trump announces US withdrawal from UN arms trade treaty, submitted: 4/26/2019 9:28:02 PM, 226 points (+226|-0)

Wake up Little Darlin', submitted: 5/23/2019 2:09:06 AM, 32 points (+32|-0)

Heads up, Patriots! DJT on Hannity, submitted: 3/27/2019 9:06:34 AM, 12 points (+13|-1)

Truth Seeps Out! Russian Hackers Identified!, submitted: 3/29/2019 2:37:28 PM, 10 points (+10|-0)

Resisting this change is futile..., submitted: 5/17/2019 1:51:04 PM, 9 points (+9|-0)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Didn't Q already tell us 'by the First of June'?, submitted: 5/23/2019 10:38:52 AM, -1 points (+2|-3)

R U Diabetic?, submitted: 7/19/2019 1:53:00 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)

Liberty or Death?, submitted: 4/4/2019 3:17:45 PM, 1 points (+1|-0)

A quote from Theodore Roosevelt, submitted: 4/3/2019 12:59:21 PM, 2 points (+3|-1)

Coincidence? Chelsea Handler / Rachael Chandler, submitted: 3/29/2019 2:14:43 PM, 4 points (+4|-0)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Trump announces US withdrawal from UN arms trade treaty submitted by ledbetter to GreatAwakening

ledbetter 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago

Glory Hallelujah! Never thought I would see this, but I underestimated the depth of this man's commitment to America and the size of the family jewels. DJTrump just won 2020 in a brilliant stroke. Everything happens only when the time is right.

Dems are imploding submitted by PearlyWhiteGates to GreatAwakening

ledbetter 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago

Could one observe a common objective? as: Trust the Plan? Can we recall Trump's support of Pelosi for Speaker when the dimms retook the house planning on impeaching Trump. His plan was to give up the house and give them all the rope while he prevented any real action via the Senate. In my view, they could not have written a better plan! Trump is patient, and he plays a very long game. Perhaps he didn't expect AOC, or Ilion or Cowboy RIchardson, but there are certainly others. He takes advantage of opportunities to help them look stupid, and they beat each other up. When your enemy is making a fool of themselves, stay out of their way!

I've said it continuously since the end of the 2016 election: Voat is the only place I hear about trannies or CNN (MSM in general) submitted by Anson to politics

ledbetter 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago

Perhaps you could broaden your base of sources.

3 lowest rated comments:

Are Jews Evil? submitted by ledbetter to AskVoat

ledbetter 7 points -6 points (+1|-7) ago

I make No presumption at all. I simply asked a logical question, which clearly triggered your emotional center of mass. You really should focus on reality and get your head out of continuous fucking - or is fucking the sole purpose of your existence? How does one define a 3rd-grade "education"? It begins with the words you use. Are these the only words you (and your buds) know?

Ben Garrison - 'Reparations, Paid In Full' submitted by GodsAngell to GreatAwakening

ledbetter 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago

Yes of course. But only because Many of the people who fought in the war of 1866 - 70 were NOT black. This is NOT a value judgment! If half were black and half white and 90% of the dead were white, you might have a point, but clearly most of the fighters were white, simply because there were more white people to begin with,

Why take prisoners and go the extra step of gassing them separately when you could suffocate them with the oven exhausts of the last batch before throwing them in ? submitted by GIF-lLL-S0NG to AskVoat

ledbetter 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago

I believe you meant "could HAVE" as in past conditional - that is, unless you are planning something. Obviously, you're not going back to do it over, so what's your logic here?