Profile overview for anonymouslurker2000.
Submission statistics

This user made no submissions.

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 0 discussions and submitted a total of 164 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 216 and downvoted 69 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 556 and downvoted 152 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

5 lowest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Someone's feeling awfully confident lately... submitted by Mrs_Ogynist01 to pizzagate

anonymouslurker2000 2 points 23 points (+25|-2) ago

You've summed it up perfectly. Unfortunately, as much as some on here might not like to admit, PG on the surface sounds fucking mental, if you're not open-minded enough to look into it for yourself and look beyond the MSM distortions, then you're never going to think PG is anything other than bullshit. I just don't know how you can get past that with people, especially when most are far too busy watching shit on TV to want to spend any time into researching something like PG, the only reason I looked into PG was a bit of curiosity and time on my hands.

As someone who has rarely followed 'conspiracy theories' in the past, I thought it was bullshit when I first heard about it as well, I looked at the evidence and thought it was all very strange and worth looking into, but still was far from convinced. And then came the bizarre MSM response and then I really became interested in PG, and this Alefantis article is nearly 6 months after it was supposedly 'debunked' . Surely even the 'normies' must wonder, why the fuck have they devoted so much time and effort into discrediting a 'crazy', 'fringe', 'alt-right' conspiracy theory?

"Pizzagate shooter" FOIA request denied, again; another look at the case submitted by V____Z to pizzagate

anonymouslurker2000 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago

Lol, yes, Alefantis, the 'little guy' who's the 49th most powerful person in DC with his close ties to some of the most powerful people in DC and the Rothschilds, numerous trips to the WH and numerous properties and businesses owned, such a nobody...

Sex slave sold at birth by her parents tells of how she was kept in a cage by her 'owner' and was flown worldwide on private jets to meet wealthy clients submitted by Truewarrior to pizzagate

anonymouslurker2000 1 points 18 points (+19|-1) ago

"She said she would escort the men to black tie affairs and high profile sporting events when she got older. "

So presumably, her story can be verified then? Can we find any pictures of this woman with her 'wealthy clients'?

3 lowest rated comments:

Alex Jones begins to deliver submitted by micha_ to pizzagate

anonymouslurker2000 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago

I certainly have my doubts over the legitimacy of Jones (especially with all those silly dodgy supplements) but some of the stuff related to pedophilia and child trafficking he's been covering today has been solid in all fairness, and PJW mentioned the countless pedophilia scandals in Europe, all of which have links to the establishment and influential institutions which is a very important point to make. Obviously I have qualms over him calling CPP a 'random pizza place' and the way he says 'Mr. Alefantis' as if JA himself is standing behind him with a gun to his head, but I think we need to understand, whatever went down with him and JA, he was clearly backed into a corner there, but the important thing is that he's still very much determined to cover the wider scandals outside of CPP, so I think he's still useful.

How has pizzagate been debunked? submitted by anonOpenPress to pizzagate

anonymouslurker2000 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

It hasn't been, a distorted misrepresentation of PG has been debunked, say it's been debunked and then give a few vague reasons and lies for why you came to that conclusion with none of your own research (AreWeSure's post is like a parody of the MSM debunking). There was no openness in the coverage, it was blatant they only ever intended to discredit it. The circumstantial evidence on its own doesn't conclusively prove anything, but the hysterical media coverage has not been consistent with the sort of coverage you'd expect for some outlandish false conspiracy theory, 5 months after they 'debunked' it and they are STILL trying to discredit the investigation with hit-pieces on Seaman and the protest, why? Why do they care so much if its 'fake news' and just a fringe conspiracy theory of nutters like they like to portray it as?

The NYT's reason for PG being debunked was that Glen Caplin, a former Clinton official so not unbiased, said that several conspiracy theories had come out of the WikiLeaks that had been 'independently debunked', by whom exactly? The article fails to mention who exactly did the debunking and how they came to the conclusion it was false and the reader is expected to just blindly trust the vague word of a former Clinton official (and now someone who works for the 'Global Strategy Group' lol), it's hardly a convincing debunking is it. And of course this is one of the most cited articles for PG being debunked, it's absurd that an article based on such a vague statement (and full of fallacies and flaws as shown here and no independent investigation apparent is used as an unquestionable authority.

Guess What Investigation Hillary Clinton Covered Up At The State Department submitted by jkick to pizzagate

anonymouslurker2000 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago

Holy crap, and it's MSM, why hasn't more of this been made before? Doesn't prove anything, but it could potentially be a significant piece of evidence to counter all the deniers saying PG couldn't possibly be true.