This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
13 submissions to funny
13 submissions to news
12 submissions to videos
4 submissions to Worldnews
3 submissions to politics
This user has so far shared a total of 54 links, started a total of 3 discussions and submitted a total of 1869 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 4839 and downvoted 1931 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 8643 and downvoted 4978 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Fact or Opinion?, submitted: 12/24/2015 7:29:54 PM, 323 points (+325|-2)
Simpsons Future Prediction Of Yale From 2005, submitted: 3/21/2016 7:58:50 AM, 284 points (+285|-1)
Something We Can All Agree On, submitted: 2/19/2016 5:42:28 PM, 205 points (+214|-9)
Japanese being Japanese, submitted: 4/29/2016 2:54:00 AM, 141 points (+145|-4)
University bans mohawks, dreadlocks, native headdresses, bandanas, and tank-tops in order to be more 'welcoming', submitted: 8/28/2015 6:04:12 PM, 118 points (+122|-4)
5 lowest rated submissions:
The timeline of Trump's ties with Russia lines up with allegations of conspiracy and misconduct, submitted: 2/12/2017 6:47:51 AM, -2 points (+6|-8)
Average World Temperature Since 1850 Visualized, submitted: 6/15/2016 9:20:42 PM, 0 points (+5|-5)
Trump: Banning Muslim immigration is 'just a suggestion', submitted: 5/12/2016 1:16:25 PM, 1 points (+5|-4)
Free speech at university under attack again, submitted: 3/17/2017 9:06:34 AM, 1 points (+1|-0)
Why one Republican voted to kill privacy rules: 'Nobody has to use the Internet', submitted: 4/15/2017 12:26:47 AM, 1 points (+3|-2)
3 highest rated comments:
Sippio 0 points 69 points 69 points (+69|-0) ago
The pair had blocked him in August, but the court heard he continued to mention them in other tweets or comment on events or subjects they were discussing on the social network. His defence argued the pair continued to “taunt” Elliott even after blocking him, and they wouldn’t have done so if they were genuinely afraid of him.
There we go. It was a 2-way flame-war, but the girls acted like helpless victims.
Sippio 0 points 63 points 63 points (+63|-0) ago
That triumphant look she has at the end. "This is the greatest moment of my life. I just scored a professional football goal naked. I know I'm about to be arrested. I don't care. Nothing in my life will top this moment."
Sippio 6 points 48 points 54 points (+54|-6) ago
Well technically it is. It can also be considered a mental disorder, and the lines between orientation and mental disorder can be blurry at best.
We oppose paedophilia in order to protect children. Full stop. We all agree that children are not capable of this kind of decision-making, and should therefore not be sexually involved with adults. It has nothing to do with punishing adults just for having a sexual attraction we have deemed unacceptable. Of course it should remain illegal, but the self-righteous hatred some of us have for these people is preventing them from seeking real help that might prevent a child from becoming their victim.
If we lose focus on why it is wrong, then it's hardly different than the way we treated fags in the 1950s.
3 lowest rated comments:
Sippio 20 points -18 points 2 points (+2|-20) ago
ITT: Triggered Voaters with accusations of propaganda and hypocrisy instead of articulating why and how the linked statement is factually wrong.
Sippio 16 points -14 points 2 points (+2|-16) ago
Interesting method of dismissal.
Check his profile:
New? Paid shill with new account.
Old? Paid shill who bought account.
Also nice touch with the irrelevant speculation about using an Iphone from a Starbucks wifi. It's almost as if you think that would have any bearing on the actual statement he made. You should instead make an argument about how @jw48335 is wrong instead of lazy ad hominem attacks.
Edit: Yes, it's easier to downvoat than actually articulate an argument.