Profile overview for Plump_Donald.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

1 submissions to ProtectVoat

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 1 discussions and submitted a total of 7 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 0 and downvoted 0 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 1 and downvoted 0 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

5 lowest rated submissions:

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Schumer stabs 9/11 victims in the back submitted by nomenimion to politics

Plump_Donald 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago

You Republican scum are just amazing. You go out of your goddamned way to legislatively block the compensation claims of the 9/11 first responders (the guys who all developed respiratory illnesses from breathing in the dust YOU TOLD THEM WAS SAFE) and then you accuse the Democrats of stabbing 9/11 victims in the back.

Lol. You are such pieces of shit it is fucking AMAZING. Amazing.

Schumer stabs 9/11 victims in the back submitted by nomenimion to politics

Plump_Donald 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago

I'm shocked to learn that I'm secretly a Republican. How disconcerting!

It's not too late to get the right help, brother. Together we'll get you through this.

u/stanky_bawls Just Deleted Another Two Of My Comments. No Reason Or Explanation Given. Second Time This Week. submitted by Plump_Donald to ProtectVoat

Plump_Donald 6 points -4 points (+2|-6) ago

You are trying to troll a circlejerk sub.

You're accusing me of trying to troll a troll? And this means the troll can censor my content?

LOL.

Firstly, accusing me of being a troll does not make it true. Secondly, if you continue to invent reasons and circumstances where censoring content is OK then I will leave and take the entire ex-Reddit crew with me. You are the fucking troll, for claiming Voat is anti-censorship, when the facts demonstrate otherwise.

Have a nice day.

3 lowest rated comments:

Watch: Anti-Trump Protesters In New Mexico Jump on Police Cars submitted by kmojo to news

Plump_Donald 8 points -8 points (+0|-8) ago

Or, the criminals will be arrested like a first world country should do

That's cute. So how come Bush wasn't arrested for invading Iraq illegally, in contravention of the UN charter?

those "protesters" are literally nazis

Right, Because the Nazis were anti-authoritarians. LOLOL.

It really is just amazing how much bullshit comes out of the mouths of people like you (i.e. Republicans). Amazing.

Watch: Anti-Trump Protesters In New Mexico Jump on Police Cars submitted by kmojo to news

Plump_Donald 7 points -7 points (+0|-7) ago

Trump won't allow protesters if he gets in. These people will be rounded up into a field and shot, just like the good old days in Germany.

u/stanky_bawls Just Deleted Another Two Of My Comments. No Reason Or Explanation Given. Second Time This Week. submitted by Plump_Donald to ProtectVoat

Plump_Donald 7 points -6 points (+1|-7) ago

For fucks sake, some of you are such fucking idiots. I am so tired of the "free speech" and "anti-censorship" bullshit.

Lol, right. We're idiots for not being Nazis. Good one. We're idiots for expecting to be able to express our political opinion on a website which has specifically monetized and marketed itself as being anti-censorship. LOL.

You aren't being censored

LOL. So you want to redefine the meaning of censorship to make it compatible with censoring content, yes?

Censor: an official who examines books, films, news, etc. that are about to be published and suppresses any parts that are considered obscene, POLITICALLY UNACCEPTABLE, or a threat to security.

https://www.google.de/search?q=define%3Acensor&trackid=sp-006

What you seem to be saying is that Voat is anti-censorship because only certain content is censored, yes? That seems to be what you are saying, and it is completely fucking ridiculous.

it was against the sub rules,

Firstly, I disagree that it was against the sub rules. Secondly, if I open a newpaper, and only let my journalists post content which promotes Republicans/Nazism; if I delete or restrict alternative content, then I am CENSORING CONTENT. For someone who just claimed it was "pretty fucking simple" you don't seem to have a very good understanding of what censorship is, do you?

The rules aren't subjective

I've just explained to you how and why the rules are subjective, so ignoring the part where I explained and repeating the same false claim isn't going to win you any friends here. The sub moderators have absolutely no method or way of knowing who is a "Hilary or Bernie shill" since they do not know the identity of the people who are posting there, and/or whether they are being paid by anyone. Hence, it is a matter of their own opinion who or who is not a shill. In other words, their rules are completely subjective and ostensibly give them the right to censor any content based completely on their own (false) accusations.

Typically, you're a piece of shit who is defending censorship. How is this different from Reddit? Reddit uses the exact same arguments about why certain content is removed, so you are no different from them. Reddit has removed dozens of entire subs because they "didn't follow the rules", hence prompting the exodus to Voat IN THE FIRST FUCKING PLACE!!

Prick.