Profile overview for Ken_bingo2.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

38 submissions to politics

36 submissions to funny

24 submissions to whatever

11 submissions to gifs

3 submissions to news

This user has so far shared a total of 111 links, started a total of 7 discussions and submitted a total of 4443 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 22438 and downvoted 2954 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 29626 and downvoted 2975 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

But she is so brave!, submitted: 4/20/2019 11:09:05 PM, 321 points (+327|-6)

A Farmer makes a valiant effort., submitted: 6/19/2020 12:52:06 AM, 294 points (+295|-1)

Jews falsely accuse Ben Garrison again. Lawyers say "...sue ADL into oblivion", submitted: 7/10/2019 9:19:54 PM, 257 points (+263|-6)

Women in STEM., submitted: 2/1/2019 5:58:14 PM, 248 points (+253|-5)

Unfortunately, this is accurate., submitted: 7/6/2019 12:30:01 AM, 239 points (+243|-4)

5 lowest rated submissions:

Trump cucks on military at border, submitted: 4/8/2018 5:56:46 AM, -13 points (+1|-14)

The Greatest Generation. Why they fought., submitted: 7/14/2018 6:15:43 AM, 0 points (+2|-2)

The Great Cuckening: President Trump Offers DACA Amnesty For "Wall", submitted: 1/20/2019 7:44:19 AM, 0 points (+7|-7)

2020!!! More than ever before!, submitted: 6/11/2019 4:19:17 PM, 0 points (+3|-3)

You must be retarded if you think..., submitted: 6/11/2020 10:49:45 PM, 0 points (+6|-6)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Military only recruits the best of the best, I'm sure America will never lose a war ever again. submitted by shadow332 to whatever

Ken_bingo2 5 points 97 points (+102|-5) ago

As a former Infantry Squad Leader, allow me to address this.

1) Women do not belong in the military

2) The Air Force is not the military. Maybe paramilitary, with the exception of a some pilots and a few SOF guys.

3) Rare was the day in my 10+ years that we only worked 8 hours.

4) They could be punished under the UCMJ for being assholes while in uniform

Styxhexenhammer666 marries a decent white europeon gal submitted by The_Venerable to whatever

Ken_bingo2 0 points 67 points (+67|-0) ago

Is she who we have to thank for him putting a shirt on?

When the MKUltra hits hard submitted by jewsbadnews to politics

Ken_bingo2 1 points 66 points (+67|-1) ago

I'm with Kid Rock. She is sucking jew cock to try and become and actress, because narcissism.

3 lowest rated comments:

The attack on molyneux. Just fucking look at it. submitted by Boocheus to politics

Ken_bingo2 11 points -8 points (+3|-11) ago

You need to provide reliable sources for your changes. Molyneux himself is not a reliable source for anything other than wholly non-controversial claims about himself (WP:ABOUTSELF). We certainly can't claim he is "known for his promotion of secular ethics" by citing his own videos - that provides no evidence at all for how others see him. I would encourage you to read through some of the previous discussion on this page. Virtually everything you're complaining about here has been discussed, and there's no reason to think that the consensus has changed. Nblund talk 14:50, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

    Molyneux is not a reliable source for his own views? You are nuts if you think that. He is known for his promotion of secular ethics as he has made many videos on that topic. I provided one video as a citation. You shouldn't be using any secondary sources at all to describe his views. And you certainly should not be relying 100% on secondary sources made by political opponents of his views that are deliberately mischaracterizing them.

    There is no consensus here at all. I see many other people that have complained about the obvious bias, with no adequate response to any of those concerns. If your concern is that I left the word "known for". Then we can remove that term and just replace it with "who promotes". Gmann101 (talk) 15:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

        No, he's not a reliable source for anything controversial or exceptional. The WP:BESTSOURCES are the secondary sources with a reputation for fact checking and accuracy. The description in the lead is based on those reliable, independent sources. What you're suggesting is that we should remove statements from high-quality sources, and replace them with self-serving descriptions from a low-quality source. That's not going to happen. Nblund talk 15:31, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

It's only ok to spank kids on the butt because its the one place that doesn't show bruises in public. submitted by Glipglup to whatever

Ken_bingo2 7 points -7 points (+0|-7) ago

Resorting to violence means that a parent can't match a child's intellect.

Leadership and respect, not fear and intimidation. On the spot corrections and consistency and setting a good example are all hugely important.

a new rape submitted by TREDDITFIRST to funny

Ken_bingo2 7 points -6 points (+1|-7) ago

Very rapable target. She should be protected by her brothers/father/husband. Women shouldn't have to carry, because the should be chaperoned at all times until they are married, and then the community should watch their movements closely.