Profile overview for Kadivs.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

1 submissions to AsOldAsTheInternet

1 submissions to funny

1 submissions to Furry

1 submissions to ideasforvoat

1 submissions to SVSsucks

This user has so far shared a total of 6 links, started a total of 1 discussions and submitted a total of 327 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 10 and downvoted 16 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 56 and downvoted 46 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

TIL reddits /r/coontown was banned a month ago. No wonder racism on voat increased so much recently, submitted: 9/8/2015 12:46:48 PM, 233 points (+360|-127)

Furry Force 2 (xpost /v/InterestingYoutube), submitted: 7/9/2015 1:52:02 PM, 17 points (+18|-1)

Fresh Guacamole by PES, submitted: 7/9/2015 9:41:49 AM, 12 points (+13|-1)

Long before Flappy Bird, we had Helicoptergame, submitted: 7/10/2015 8:43:51 AM, 8 points (+8|-0)

Don't disable right click menu in inline images, submitted: 7/9/2015 10:54:49 AM, 7 points (+7|-0)

5 lowest rated submissions:

They never bothered with neither 2 nor 3 on reddit. Lets hope that is a good thing: Around here without admin protection, they're actually afraid to go full brigade, submitted: 7/16/2015 10:18:45 AM, 2 points (+2|-0)

There's a whole foundation to help you get submission contribution points, submitted: 7/10/2015 11:29:49 AM, 5 points (+5|-0)

Don't disable right click menu in inline images, submitted: 7/9/2015 10:54:49 AM, 7 points (+7|-0)

Long before Flappy Bird, we had Helicoptergame, submitted: 7/10/2015 8:43:51 AM, 8 points (+8|-0)

Fresh Guacamole by PES, submitted: 7/9/2015 9:41:49 AM, 12 points (+13|-1)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

TIL reddits /r/coontown was banned a month ago. No wonder racism on voat increased so much recently submitted by Kadivs to TIL

Kadivs 38 points 94 points (+132|-38) ago

I never actually noticed that.. and what's going on here on voat since.. well about then pisses me off. It's unconfortable to read comments about "shitskins" that have plenty of upvoats

SRS members discuss their move over to voat, to harass those users as well submitted by IPFreely to MeanwhileOnReddit

Kadivs 0 points 55 points (+55|-0) ago

You don't? Well, I do. Or I did for that matter. Quite frequently in fact. Time and time again. And again. And again. And then some more. But brigading don't real. They'd never do that. Or would they?
Maybe.. Maybe they would

Scientist Offers Monsanto $10 Million to Prove Wrong his Ominous Findings on GMO Soy, to which the corporation has only been able to respond with personal attacks and no science submitted by HenryCorp to science

Kadivs 39 points 39 points (+78|-39) ago

Really, you anti-GMOs are as bad, science wise, as antivaxers and that website clearly biased. I also can't find anything about "only been able to respond with personal attacks". Seriously, why is this in a science subverse of all places? The Anti-GMO-crowd is one of the most mainstream anti-science groups out there atm.

http://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/07/29/ayyadurais-formaldehyde-in-gmos-claim-challenged-engineer-refuses-verification-offer/

His research now celebrated by anti-GMO activists, with propaganda point work by the Fenton Communications, known for its work with anti-science activist groups, didn’t measure actual formaldehyde levels in soy. [...] Basically, the research didn’t involve testing levels in actual plants, but used data plugged into a computer algorithm to predict the presence of two chemicals found naturally in crops and food: Formaldehyde and glutathione. In other words, it was a computer modeling study, so it “measured” what the researchers inputted. [...] In this case, it is unclear what data were used, and where Ayyadurai sourced them. “Online databases including PuMed and Google Scholar were searched,” the paper indicated. Though Ayyadurai asserts that he aggregated data from over six thousand studies, it’s unclear what data, in particular, were plugged in to Ayyadurai’s algorithms.
As Folta wrote, “If you developed a computer program that integrated internet data to predict the location of Munich, and the program told you it was squarely in the Gulf of Mexico, right off Florida, it does not mean that Munich is in the Gulf of Mexico, right off of Florida. It means that your program, your assumptions, or your input data are wrong. These things are quite testable.” [...] Genetic modification has “fundamentally modified the metabolic system of the soy,” he told reporters at the conference, a claim unsupported by either his research or any independent research. He presented no data. He went on to declare that “natural,” “normal” soy has a “beautiful way of detoxifying [formaldehyde]” while the “GMO of soy” as he called it, accumulates the chemical, presumably until it reaches to harmful levels. [...] There is no evidence that GMO soy or any other genetically engineered plant accumulates formaldehyde at a higher level than non-GE counterparts
[...]Shiva Ayyadurai helped launch and serves on the board of an organization that promotes organic, non-GMO food while Fran Drescher [his wife] is a rabid anti-GMO activist, who is a constant presence on social media tweeting about the dangers of modern science. And neither one of them has attempted to hide his or her bias.

Numerous scientists, led by Folta, have attempted to reach out to Ayyadurai to discuss his methodology and propose rigorous testing of his thesis, but all they’ve gotten so far is crickets and censorship. Ayyadurai and anti-GMO social media admins have been deleting challenging Facebook comments

Kevin Folta answered the call to #ShowUporShutUp by issuing The GMO Formaldehyde Challenge, in which he invited Ayyadurai to participate in university based testing of transgenic corn and soy samples, with analysis by an independent lab. [...] Ayyadurai has side stepped the invitation. On Tuesday, he said he would only agree to testing if there were new across-the-board standards — that he personally set up.
Ayyadurai’s refusal to participate in designing and performing such experiments is baffling. Why call for verification of his research predictions and then balk at following through?

3 lowest rated comments:

deleted by user submitted by hotmusician to MeanwhileOnReddit

Kadivs 11 points -6 points (+5|-11) ago

so we trust every anti-reddit conspiracy theory now?

Hungarian Camerawoman Fired for Tripping Refugees Trying to Escape Police submitted by Evrocot to videos

Kadivs 6 points -4 points (+2|-6) ago

Don't worry abput the downvoats, camera woman is white, refugees are not. So obviously she is in the right and anything you say against her will be downvoted sigh

Scientist Offers Monsanto $10 Million to Prove Wrong his Ominous Findings on GMO Soy, to which the corporation has only been able to respond with personal attacks and no science submitted by HenryCorp to science

Kadivs 6 points -4 points (+2|-6) ago

hey, we do all we can. What do you think we manage for a measily 1k a year?