Profile overview for HuginnOgMuninn.
Submission statistics

This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):

40 submissions to Wholesome

36 submissions to whatever

7 submissions to fitness

3 submissions to introductions

3 submissions to videos

This user has so far shared a total of 67 links, started a total of 35 discussions and submitted a total of 688 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 6425 and downvoted 164 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 1760 and downvoted 202 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

When you forget to sign in to your other account (-1110 CCP), submitted: 1/28/2018 9:37:33 PM, 395 points (+398|-3)

Reading the news after swallowing the red pill [OC], submitted: 8/7/2017 5:47:46 PM, 166 points (+166|-0)

Count Dankula OWNS Reporter about Context!, submitted: 4/24/2018 10:02:49 AM, 152 points (+156|-4)

alright you bitter fucks, I've canceled my Spotify subscription thanks to you, now what?, submitted: 5/26/2018 8:55:33 PM, 77 points (+78|-1)

Clint Eastwood movie about real world heroes starring said real world heroes. Good family values., submitted: 6/28/2018 6:29:16 PM, 67 points (+69|-2)

5 lowest rated submissions:

r/4chan is subversive degeneracy, submitted: 5/15/2017 1:57:53 AM, -5 points (+3|-8)

Wtf is this now, submitted: 5/19/2017 8:05:24 PM, -3 points (+3|-6)

any heart right subs here? anyone got love in their heart?, submitted: 7/1/2018 9:17:45 AM, 0 points (+2|-2)

I want a real discussion about changing the left's views., submitted: 10/6/2018 10:36:16 AM, 1 points (+3|-2)

Psychological Significance of the Biblical Stories: 1st lecture, submitted: 5/21/2017 3:34:46 PM, 1 points (+2|-1)

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Is fph really people just hate jerking? submitted by jew-s-a to AskVoat

HuginnOgMuninn 4 points 85 points (+89|-4) ago

This was born out of the postmodern/cultural marxist movement of HAES (healthy at every size). this was a movement of people telling the world that there is nothing inherently unhealthy with being a fatty. Furthermore, they peddled body acceptance, and said fat is beautiful, then they went further and started fit-shaming. They shamed exercise and healthy eating and beauty itself.

This beckoned a strong response. A counter movement sprung up. This is FPH.

Imagine being extremely fit, exercising, eating right, taking care of yourself. Healthy, beautiful.

Now imagine being shat on for it, listening to ugly fat heaps of garbage spout insane bullshit on the internet, radio and TV nonstop for years.

I bet you still don't get it. You'd have already understood just by visiting FPH.

Imagine being extremely smart. studying, questioning, thinking. examining logical arguments carefully with intellectual honesty.

Now imagine being shat on for it, listening to stupid fucks calling you gay for being smart on all imaginable media for years. They'd be promoting their ugly culture of poorly thought, sensational, over-emotional bullshit arguments, and calling smart people faggots.

Do you get it now?

No matter how much you whine, whats down under makes a difference. submitted by KennyBrassen to funny

HuginnOgMuninn 0 points 80 points (+80|-0) ago

Those 15 year olds should demand the same amounts for playing against them.

Facebook Will Use Artificial Intelligence to Police 'Extremist' Content submitted by fluxusp to technology

HuginnOgMuninn 0 points 38 points (+38|-0) ago

Something tells me they're not talking about isis, taliban or violant leftism

3 lowest rated comments:

Does Political Correctness Makes Race study and human Genetics Taboo or socialist blasphemy in the West/USA? submitted by Lazmat to science

HuginnOgMuninn 5 points -4 points (+1|-5) ago

I understand you had to vent and get this out of your system. We all go through life bearing heavier burdens because of what we know. But we aren't brainwashed and all of this is obvious to us, so stop with your spamming.

Remove loli subs from 'random NSFW subverse' submitted by i_scream_trucks to AskVoat

HuginnOgMuninn 5 points -3 points (+2|-5) ago

You're approaching this from an intellectual perspective, perhaps that's best. It's certainly not a good idea to hunt down people you think are disgusting and kill them for that reason alone.

I won't believe any study claiming harmlessness or even help. Whatever the body of literature, it will always be suspect.

There are predators out there, they must not be allowed to normalise their behaviour.

Google, bing, yahoo the terms 'img', 'img src'.

There are too many people complicit, hiding behind non-harm. But they're carrying the goalpost, moving the line in the sand. They say 'I don't know where the line should be, but not here' because that way they can justify their inaction.

But we all have our own lines, and we as a culture have forgotten how to defend them. Doesn't mean we should wait for proof of harm, the line of the least moral among us.

I defend my own line in the sand. This is where I drew it. At the start of my disgust.

Fuck this, I don't want to ever see this. If you force me to ever see this, fuck you. Get this the fuck out of my sight.

One is a mumified human body in gold, the other "art". Then consider who owns the "art" submitted by 8318665 to whatever

HuginnOgMuninn 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago

can we not wildly speculate please?

There is nothing to suggest there is a body inside, or the artwork is inspired by Dahmer; Nothing. I get that you guys don't like the guy but let's keep it remotely intelligent shall we?

Inb4 the artwork is actually fragments of Judas Iscariot encased in antimatter, proving the earth is flat, checkmate atheists