Profile overview for Dismember.
Submission statistics

This user made no submissions.

This user has so far shared a total of 0 links, started a total of 0 discussions and submitted a total of 361 comments.

Voting habits

Submissions: This user has upvoted 1654 and downvoted 0 submissions.

Comments: This user has upvoted 1728 and downvoted 0 comments.

Submission ratings

5 highest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

5 lowest rated submissions:

This user made no submissions.

Comment ratings

3 highest rated comments:

Queen Anita releases a new video. Everybody pretends to be interested so they don't get banned. submitted by Cuck-a-doodle-doo to NeoFAG

Dismember 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago

Dear ERA users:

If you like someone or what they do because they are a woman or black, regardless of their virtues(or lack of), then you might just be the thing you say you despise most. You protect them because you think they are less than beings than you and need your protection. It's a hard pill to swallow but once you do everyone will be better off.

If @kevdude and @crensch get any gayer for each other submitted by heygeorge to SoapboxBanhammer

Dismember 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago

I'm getting asked what the fuck I'm laughing at for a full minute now from another room and I have to tell a lie because showing them this would be far too embarrassing.

Whoever uses Facebook is a FAGGOT submitted by DesertFox33 to whatever

Dismember 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago

I used it once for a short period of time and I was soon disgusted by the shallow, gossipy and insecure bunch of people who tend to become power users on that platform. And that was just people I knew. Taking myself off there meant I became somewhat of a non-entity even to some in my family but I can live with that.

edit: spelling

3 lowest rated comments:

My face when one year ago, Srayzie "doxxed" the user hojuruku using his real face pics, and trolled him to the point of him leaving voat. Srayzie hypocrisy 11/10. Where was the outrage? submitted by ExpertShitposter to ProtectVoat

Dismember 7 points -6 points (+1|-7) ago

Back when I was owner here before, the sub was spammed and attacked heavily so we added flairs to make it easy for people who come here for the intended purpose of the sub(see below quote) to read. The other alternative was deleting topics and the users decided flairs was better. I took a break from being a mod here for the last year so maybe the other mods don't flair shit as much as I do.

This sub is for documenting the attempts to drag Voat down into the mud by various censorship, advertising or shilling groups.

the owner and mod of v/consoleproletariat is banning people for asking him to archive links to restera, his name is @16Mega submitted by PeacefulAssassin to ProtectVoat

Dismember 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago

@16mega whats your excuse for being a faggot? Do you actually post on that shitty radical left site?

Q: What did Voat say to the bad goat? A: Wanna see my hammer? No? Too bad. Here it is. submitted by PuttItOut to Voat

Dismember 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago

Both forms of manipulations got addressed

There's actually a third form which is very prevalent on Voat and it's to do with upvoting unknowing third parties to help push subverses and certain ideals to the top. For example; if I was(I'm not) a PV mod I could upvote a thread by a random user 15 times and if I did that regularly then PV would become a popular and accepted sub. Similar things might happen in v/Soapboxbanhammer or any other sub or just random threads with a similar political message. @PuttItOut might already know this since he caught the loophole of abusing new accounts having unlimited upvotes if they didn't log out. Granted he was three years late to the party on that, but better late than never.