This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
101 submissions to Jeer
61 submissions to politics
55 submissions to AnarchoCapitalism
54 submissions to whatever
35 submissions to gaming
This user has so far shared a total of 485 links, started a total of 42 discussions and submitted a total of 3447 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 20945 and downvoted 661 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 25404 and downvoted 866 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Choose your character, submitted: 8/22/2015 2:43:37 PM, 599 points (+612|-13)
White Privilege, submitted: 5/22/2017 12:56:26 PM, 332 points (+332|-0)
Why the police killing of this unarmed white man hasn't led to national outcry , submitted: 8/5/2015 2:33:41 PM, 268 points (+282|-14)
German Constitutional lawyer concludes, "A government that decides to change the ethnic and cultural structure of the country without asking its people violates the principle of popular sovereignty.", submitted: 9/22/2016 3:41:00 PM, 246 points (+247|-1)
The DNC has been positively Orwellian this time around: the phony smiles and creepy phrases, the dystopian censorship and manipulation of the public. Has it been at this magnitude before?, submitted: 7/30/2016 12:47:31 AM, 172 points (+176|-4)
5 lowest rated submissions:
Tweets Suggest Patreon Hack May Be GamerGate Related, submitted: 10/1/2015 5:18:26 PM, -1 points (+1|-2)
LPT: How well do you know your shit?, submitted: 9/4/2015 2:21:38 AM, 0 points (+1|-1)
How to Make $6.6 Million in One Day by Playing Video Games, submitted: 8/13/2015 2:09:01 AM, 0 points (+2|-2)
How realistic is the idea that Scuckland will get another referendum for independence from England, now that Brexit has happened?, submitted: 6/25/2016 2:28:54 PM, 0 points (+2|-2)
BurqaNN -- News from under the Burqa, submitted: 3/30/2016 8:13:58 PM, 1 points (+2|-1)
3 highest rated comments:
Dereliction 0 points 134 points 134 points (+134|-0) ago
Just stop buying EA games, idiots.
Dereliction 0 points 99 points 99 points (+99|-0) ago
Why are we always scurrying around and playing whack-a-mole every time a new bill comes up instead of taking proactive steps to fight censorship?
Because almost no one represents our interests in government.
3 lowest rated comments:
Dereliction 7 points -3 points 4 points (+4|-7) ago
There is no candidate, running or otherwise, who can fix the problems and system we have right now. No one. Not even the Trumpster.
In some sense, we may be better off with someone like Clinton--hear me out!--because the system will break down faster. Someone like Trump, at best, will only prolong the situation. Having it collapse is the only way we have a chance to build something new. Or at least, someone in a future generation who will have the chance to rise from the ashes of it all.
Dereliction 3 points -3 points 0 points (+0|-3) ago
He didn't sign it yet and appears to be signaling that he might veto. Bit early to come out with the cries of "Fuck Donald!"