This user has mostly submitted to the following subverses (showing top 5):
62 submissions to SoapboxBanhammer
44 submissions to whatever
38 submissions to aww
32 submissions to music
22 submissions to PaddysPub
This user has so far shared a total of 319 links, started a total of 35 discussions and submitted a total of 1982 comments.
Submissions: This user has upvoted 4380 and downvoted 578 submissions.
Comments: This user has upvoted 4898 and downvoted 1190 comments.
5 highest rated submissions:
Arkansas sheriff with a sense of humor, submitted: 10/11/2018 11:13:39 AM, 494 points (+500|-6)
Saving refugees, submitted: 11/12/2018 6:16:30 PM, 286 points (+293|-7)
Only 52? Come one guys we can do better than that., submitted: 11/11/2018 11:13:16 AM, 266 points (+269|-3)
Women of Voat vs. women of Reddit, submitted: 3/11/2019 1:08:56 AM, 266 points (+280|-14)
This guy is a leftist professor btw.., submitted: 4/11/2019 11:38:50 PM, 247 points (+252|-5)
5 lowest rated submissions:
At least Twitter doesn't ban you for this.., submitted: 12/30/2018 11:56:02 PM, -5 points (+8|-13)
Google Street View: Try turning the camera around a bit., submitted: 7/22/2018 8:50:00 AM, -3 points (+3|-6)
Timezones everyone, submitted: 9/22/2018 7:11:50 AM, -1 points (+2|-3)
WTF is wrong with people??, submitted: 10/23/2018 10:20:48 PM, -1 points (+4|-5)
We are.. Kermit!, submitted: 11/1/2018 7:25:22 AM, -1 points (+3|-4)
3 highest rated comments:
C_Corax 15 points 95 points 110 points (+110|-15) ago
It's an old goat. If you look at the stipulations that was made, it's very clear it's someone who wants Voat to remain the way it is(minus the downtimes). And that is all any of us really needs to know.
Edit: There seem to be a few braindead individuals that don't get it so I'll elaborate.
If I had the funding to sponsor Voat, my requirements would basically have been the same. As a passion project. I would have different requirements for a business investment.
If I had such fundings to casually toss at something such as Voat, the last thing I would want to do would be to dox myself or my businesses that allowed me to sponsor such a thing in the first place.
Some of you really aren't connected with how the world works..
Announcement that recent rolling blackouts in South Africa were due to "Rocks instead of coal being supplied to power stations" and "Everyone in the control room went to the bathroom at the same time" submitted by MyCountryTheShithole to news
C_Corax 0 points 74 points 74 points (+74|-0) ago
So are niggers so dumb that they think rocks will burn? I went and looked a bit further into the story and the answer is 'kinda'..?
From what I can gather it wasn't a matter of attempting to replace coal with rocks as the headlines suggest, but a matter of the suppliers(also run by niggers these days), couldn't supply enough coal and elected to mix up the coal they did have with rocks thinking no one would notice.
Now if you heat up rocks hard enough, they are gonna explode. Which in turn caused damage to the boilers. Which will make a lot of red lights start blinking in the control room.. Niggers not understanding white mans magic technology do what niggers do and run away thinking that the issue will fix itself or doesn't exist if they aren't there. Hence why they all suddenly went to the bathroom.. The last part is just my personal theory, but it does sound plausible.
3 lowest rated comments:
C_Corax 9 points -9 points 0 points (+0|-9) ago
As click baity change of headlines goes, this is one of the better I have seen in a while.
Also, it's subject to the usual "can't be seen in your region" bullshit..
C_Corax 20 points -6 points 14 points (+14|-20) ago
Lemme guess. Nigger?