[–] sawthelight_ 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Wow. I'm saving this. Thank you op. This is one of the greatest pieces of race realism I have read in years.
[–] ShitArchon 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Cuckoo birds have a strategy for dealing with this, however. Although cuckoo birds refuse to raise their own young, they are not above providing some amount of parental protection. When they find that one of their eggs has been removed from a nest they have parasitized, they immediately destroy the entire nest, and attack the smaller parents, often killing them. With such a threat hanging over their heads, it’s little wonder that small birds so strenuously provide for the cuckoo in their midst.
Holy shit, this perfectly explains the behavior of Michael Brown's parents. Him getting shot was akin to birds refusing to feed a cuckoo hatchling.
[–] 502_Bad_Gateway 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Disagree. Jew shills are the tards. Miss Nx.
[–] lystmord 2 points 10 points 12 points (+12|-2) ago (edited ago)
Fucking brilliant. This is the best explanation I've seen so far of how liberals and RINOs don't "get" the slur, because they don't grasp the volkish instinct that inspired it.
Neocons think that "cuck" is driven by weak, unsuccessful [read: lower-class] men lashing out. Liberals think it is driven by white men as a racial class struggling not to forfeit anything to poor oppressed minorities (as well as being angry at women's "sexual agency”). They both think the term is comparable to "faggot." They think it is merely an emasculating slur. So they think it has the fluidity of "faggot" - they think it could mean anything that seems weak to any other given person.
Have you noticed some of them trying to use it in the wrong way? Trying to redefine it? Like they will say that opposing immigration is "cowardly" and tell you that makes you a cuck! Then they seem very pleased with themselves. In their mind, they just called you the "new" version of faggot. They think it was very cutting.
They don't realize that "cuck" has a very particular meaning that goes well beyond merely being weak. It escapes them that the term is a comment on their failures not just as individual people, but as part of [what should be] an integrated whole. They refuse to accept that their ancestors would be ashamed of them - or that this matters. They do not believe that their descendants (should cucks have any) will be ashamed of them.
They're just smugly certain that in the here and now, they are doing the "stronger" thing and demonstrating that they aren't "afraid" of out-groups they should very well consider a threat. They are pleased with themselves for betraying their families, their people and their nations. They don't understand a frame of thought in which their behaviour isn't righteous.
Because they're cucks.
[–] Cooner_McCloud [S] ago
You are in error about the neocons - - they know exactly what 'cuck' means. I have seen two of them on a TV political interview wincing and discussing being called 'cuck' with a grimace.
With any new meme there are always a few people left 'out of the loop', but so what. Percentage wise, almost everybody knows what 'cuck' means.. even the neo-Cohens who are feeling the pain of it.
[–] lystmord ago
Oh, I'm sure some of them get it, at least intellectually. I was thinking of a lot of self-declared "conservatives" on Twitter who've got, say, adopted black kids. Can't even conserve their own family line, but, you know, they've voted Republican for 30 years!