I guess that's where we differ, then. I don't believe anyone had the right to use intimidation and threats as a platform to voice their grievances, and these students obviously do. When their threatening actions were met with consequences instead of the sackless "tolerance" offered at other schools, they decided (probably wisely) to go back to legal methods of protest.
But if you'd prefer decisions be made by whomever has the bigger, angrier mob, I suppose the students were the good guys who got screwed here.
[–] Gracchi ago (edited ago)
The people using real intimidation and threats here are the administrators of the school. They threatened the police and expulsion and I explained in my prior comment how serious those threats are. In this case the students aren't anywhere close to as threatening. They hold no power. They can't cause the administratoes to lose their education and get a pemanent black mark on their records that will last forever. They can just protest and cause minor inconveniences.