[–] ThisIsntMe123 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
“Not only will alimony be affected by the proposed legislation, but also timesharing,” Quick said. “The bill is calling for a 50/50 timeshare split. This affects child support payments. More timesharing equals less payments."
Right... Because you'd need less. Also, kudos for not saying "less payments to the woman".
"Regardless if the child is more bonded with one parent over another"
I wonder who you'll say is more bonded...
"or if one parent works longer hours, or if the parent has emotional or substance abuse issues — there will be an equal split."
So, you'd be all for me getting me kids if the mother is addicted to something? No? Huh.
"The kids should have a say in whom they want to live with."
That's something that every parent should ask their kids. It's great bonding.
"And that person should be able to afford their clothing, food and activities."
So, as you say men make more money, you're also saying I should get said kids because I can afford them without help? How gracious and mature of you.
"We must ask ourselves ‘What is in the best interest of the child?’"
Best interest of the child is not to be used like a pawn/meal ticket. This law keeps the kid from being used that way. As much as I dislike Rick Scott, I hope this gets signed.
[–] the_doctor_is_in 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
And of course the picture they put at the top of the article is race-mixing propaganda. Fucking degeneracy everywhere.
[–] jokersmild 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
"They" are going to start weening women off the child support teat soon so that they have to start relying on a man again and having to be sweet about it.