4
40

[–] zxcvbnm4762 [S] 4 points 40 points (+44|-4) ago 

RIP Bill of Rights, RIP freedom. Minorities (who due to demographic changes will be majorities in 25 years) mostly support such laws, of course. I can't wait for the death of social capital, in-group altruism, extremely high violent crime rates, institutionalized anti-white laws (already happening thanks to the Jews and long march through the institutions to teach minorities to hate whites and Whites to hate ourselves), and it will be fun to be a hated minority in a dystopian Orwellian state without freedom of speech in the country we Europeans built as a bastion of freedom

3
19

[–] Sinful_Casshern 3 points 19 points (+22|-3) ago  (edited ago)

But if it's hate speech towards whites it's OK

1
9

[–] Ser_Snow 1 point 9 points (+10|-1) ago 

Hate Speech = Power+Privledge

So no, of course not.

0
16

[–] Unreasonable 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

If you can't guarantee the protection of the individual; the smallest minority, then you have no minority protections.

1
14

[–] Dereliction 1 point 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

Is this an April Fool's or are the large majority of Democrats really this fucking stupid?

3
16

[–] BoiseNTheHood 3 points 16 points (+19|-3) ago 

Do you really have to ask this question? Of course they're that stupid.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
14

[–] CowWithBeef 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

This is why they put it in the constitution. They knew free speech would face relentless opposition.

2
2

[–] MST-Negates 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

Why else would they be democrats?

[–] [deleted] 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] Pawn 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

terrorists. That's why you need to vote trump, because he will make sure the NSA has all the funding and support to root those cucks out.

4
0

[–] akuta 4 points 0 points (+4|-4) ago 

Except that's not what the article says at all (looking at the sensationalized link title).

"Most Democrats (51%) support criminalizing hate speech"

That's not a "large majority." That's the smallest majority number you can have.

4
0

[–] zxcvbnm4762 [S] 4 points 0 points (+4|-4) ago 

Most Democrats (51%) support criminalizing hate speech, with only 26% opposed.

3
0

[–] Shoggoth 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago  (edited ago)

By that logic, we could argue that a majority of republicans also support banning hate speech, since only 47% are opposed.

3
2

[–] BoiseNTheHood 3 points 2 points (+5|-3) ago 

"Hate speech" will of course be defined as "anything short of full-blown Marxism" if leftists actually get their way on this.

0
0

[–] Oda ago 

No, they won't even define it. They will just use it at their leisure to silence anyone who stands in their way, which, of course, is anyone who isn't a full-blown Marxist.

1
5

[–] Joe_McCarthy 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

It mostly just means we shoot them and they run away.

3
1

[–] newoldwave 3 points 1 point (+4|-3) ago 

Liberal Democrat definition of "hate speech" = anything they don't agree with

load more comments ▼ (20 remaining)