3
-1

[–] maxk42 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

This is it my friends.

This is how the national socialists used the power of Good Intentions to create the worst abuses of human rights in history. And we're doing it to ourselves.

0
1

[–] crazy_eyes 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

A large majority of democrats are the ones who spew the most hate speeh

0
3

[–] epsilona01 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I consider speaking out against the 1st amendment to be hate speech.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] Lobotomy 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

At least someone here is asking the big questions.

2
-1

[–] Moonbat 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

In the unfortunate event such legislation is ever passed, it's going to be fun to watch the histrionics when certain groups (feminists, BLM, etc.) find out that it can be used against them, too.

2
1

[–] zxcvbnm4762 [S] 2 points 1 point (+3|-2) ago 

The problem is that it wouldn't be. When whites become a minority, minorities will vote Democrat for the gibs as usual, and we will end up in an Orwellian progressive dystopia with no First or Second Amendment, so we would be at the mercy of people who hate us.

Am I wrong in this analysis? I'd like to be, but I don't think I am

0
0

[–] Arrvee ago 

You are not wrong. Every time these restrictions have been put into place in private institutions they have been enforced in an entirely one-sided manner.

1
2

[–] niggerfaggot1488 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

GG Freedom

0
4

[–] myth2sbr 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Well that's a step backwards

3
1

[–] newoldwave 3 points 1 point (+4|-3) ago 

Liberal Democrat definition of "hate speech" = anything they don't agree with

load more comments ▼ (12 remaining)