[–] Fuckbilbo11 ago
Why do you agree with it? Do you know that how gassing are "said to have happened" are impossible and is not only the Leuchter report that says it right?
So many of our arguments start and fail this way. You want to argue the "heart of the matters" where as I argue "meta rules for the right way to argue."
If you bring up Gene Ray, don't ask me to refute him. It is sufficient enough to attack the source. If you bring up Neil Whitehead, don't ask me to refute him. It is sufficient to attack the source.
A debate about the IFR report can only occur with you after you recognize the authority of IFR over the Leuchter report, and once you have chemistry training, which you currently do not have.
Slavery was wrong,
Objectively or subjectively?
it's caused us much sorrow,
So what? What is the relationship between sorrow and wrongness?
The holocaust is a joke.
Pope John Paul 2 apologized.
Black abortions are good.
Contradicts the moral authority of the pope. Contradicts natural theology.
[–] eagleshigh [S] ago
The hear of the matter, the truth, is what matters.
Attacking credentials is retarded. Attack what he says. You still have yet to tell me about twins studies, why they're used to see heritability, and how genetics is involved. You still have yet to explain if it's genetic, why are only 20 percent of twins gay? Why are 11 to 13 percent of twins gay in the Whitehead cite?
So I don't have chemistry training, I can't say anything about the report? Plz.
It was wrong to us because of how much sorrow and death niggers have caused us.
See above.
So because he apologized means it happened? Not true.
How about this? Those 17 million abortions saved humans in America much pain in their lives from ape attacks. That's not a good thing?
Mauritania outlawed slavery in 2007. They're still doing it though. They also force feed their women. It's their cultcha, that makes it ok right? Obesity is attractive to them so they force feed their daughters in an attempt to make them obese. Who are we to tell. Others how to live right? If niggers want to hold slaves and force feed their women to become obese, why should we stop them? It's fine in their society. They're abnormal to our society, we're abnormal to theirs.
Niggers should go back to Africa. Then they can stop complaining about ebil YT.
[–] Fuckbilbo11 ago (edited ago)
Yes, truth is what matters. But we do not need to discuss the ins and outs of TimeCube theory. It just needs to be stated that the theory is not respected. That was a direct path to truth. When getting to the truth about Zyklon B, it saves us time to point out that Leuchter is no authority.
You tried to pull the same shit with the Simon of Trent debate. I ask why the Jews confessed, and you answer, "It happened all the time." And here I say that Leuchter is an eagleshigh, and you answer, "There are other reports than the Leuchter report too!" Well, you should have put that forward when making your case. Put forward the good, credible information, and leave out the discredited information. And that means not bringing up the Leuchter report.
Oh my God. Jesus. Don't you get what you're doing? Imagine if I said, "You still haven't explained how the flag was waving if there's no gravity on the moon!" Why isn't it enough to mention that NASA is respected, and the denier I'm talking to is an idiot with a high school education? Don't you get that I don't need to explain to you why the flag was waving? I can make a meta argument like, "If you are right, you would think all of the authorities that are smarter than you would also agree with you." Some things on the frontiers are controversial, and scientists can respectfully disagree. But other things have attained CONSENSUS and are not worth arguing about. I can act like an eagleshigh and ask you creationist questions about evolution all day, say you never refuted me, and give my creationist sources again directly after you refuted them and say that you haven't. After doing this forever, I can claim that the rest of your conclusions about IQ and race are wrong because they depend on evolution, which has shown to be false by my expert scientist who has all the credibility of Leuchter.
You are not interested in truth. You are interested in repeating lies that you know are lies, in order to spread hate.
Okay, how about you make some fucking claim that isn't a page long, or a paragraph long? How about some sentence about some chemical and the amount of time it takes to do something. Get that science fact. Find the fact in the IFR report that is wrong. Find the fact in the Leuchter report that is right. Tell me that fact. Don't quote a fucking wall. Tell me one basic fact about chemistry that the IFR report got wrong and that Leuchter got right.
You merely repeated this. Why is causing sorrow and death wrong?
What is any of this about?
Is this a scientific, historical, mathematical, or philosophical statement?