[–] Fuckbilbo11 ago
Why do you deny the IFR report?
Gas chambers in the way they're said doesn't real.
Why do you deny the IFR report?
Yea, I love that man.
You just disagree with him regarding the Holocaust, slavery, and black abortions.
Doesn't say anything to his findings. Appeal to authority, yawn.
Just don't call fallacy, fucking idiot, because you do it incorrectly.
[–] eagleshigh [S] ago
Why do you agree with it? Do you know that how gassing are "said to have happened" are impossible and is not only the Leuchter report that says it right?
Slavery was wrong, it's caused us much sorrow, more than we gained from enslaving niggers. The holocaust is a joke. Black abortions are good. Unless you like throwing money into the money out called Africa?
You say hurrr his credentials. It's a form of it. You're saying not to take him seriously because of his credentials. If that's the case, plz refute his report.
[–] Fuckbilbo11 ago
So many of our arguments start and fail this way. You want to argue the "heart of the matters" where as I argue "meta rules for the right way to argue."
If you bring up Gene Ray, don't ask me to refute him. It is sufficient enough to attack the source. If you bring up Neil Whitehead, don't ask me to refute him. It is sufficient to attack the source.
A debate about the IFR report can only occur with you after you recognize the authority of IFR over the Leuchter report, and once you have chemistry training, which you currently do not have.
Objectively or subjectively?
So what? What is the relationship between sorrow and wrongness?
Pope John Paul 2 apologized.
Contradicts the moral authority of the pope. Contradicts natural theology.