[–] Gerplunckamo 2 points 4 points 6 points (+6|-2) ago
Isn't spamming against the user agreement Amalek?
[–] 4693243? 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago
Rather than avoid the issue by pointing out that Amalek too has broken the UA, why not address the fact that two users have (allegedly) broken the UA, and try to do something about it? Amalek's actions do not justify hecho's any more than hecho's justify Amalek's. Independent of each other, there is guilt. Evidence needs to be put forth of such breaches of the UA and presented to @Atko or sub-owners/moderators if action is to be taken. Yelling back and forth about who has done what achieves nothing.
[–] [deleted] 5 points 1 point 6 points (+6|-5) ago
[–] frankenham 3 points -1 points 2 points (+2|-3) ago
Looks like he has a handful of alt accounts to defend himself. Dude seriously needs to be institutionalized.
[–] gregorypeckerwood 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Can we collectively ban hecho from the planet while we're at it
[–] [deleted] 4 points 1 point 5 points (+5|-4) ago
[–] Dead-_ [S] 8 points -2 points 6 points (+6|-8) ago
So what, just because others have doesn't mean you can break the rules.
You broke the user agreement. You need to go.
[–] [deleted] 4 points 0 points 4 points (+4|-4) ago (edited ago)