[–] [deleted] 4 points 1 point 5 points (+5|-4) ago
[–] 4693243? 1 point 7 points 8 points (+8|-1) ago
Rather than avoid the issue by pointing out that Amalek too has broken the UA, why not address the fact that two users have (allegedly) broken the UA, and try to do something about it? Amalek's actions do not justify hecho's any more than hecho's justify Amalek's. Independent of each other, there is guilt. Evidence needs to be put forth of such breaches of the UA and presented to @Atko or sub-owners/moderators if action is to be taken. Yelling back and forth about who has done what achieves nothing.
[–] [deleted] 5 points 1 point 6 points (+6|-5) ago
[–] frankenham 3 points -1 points 2 points (+2|-3) ago
Looks like he has a handful of alt accounts to defend himself. Dude seriously needs to be institutionalized.
[–] el_em_en_oh ago
Amelek vs. Hecho... ding-ding-ding-ding.
Fighters into the ring. This is a fight to the death.
HERE'S HOPING IT'S A TIE!!!
[–] gregorypeckerwood 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Can we collectively ban hecho from the planet while we're at it
[–] Rottcodd 6 points 15 points 21 points (+21|-6) ago (edited ago)
I think I speak for most of the userbase when I say that there's almost nothing as satisfying and appropriate as the two of you fighting with each other.
I only hope that it's to the death, and a tie.
[–] Dead-_ [S] 8 points 1 point 9 points (+9|-8) ago
He needs to get banned and have his subs deleted. He's not well. He promotes pedophilia and posts sexualized pictures of minors. He's violating Voats user agreement.
[–] Gerplunckamo 2 points 4 points 6 points (+6|-2) ago
Isn't spamming against the user agreement Amalek?