0
0

[–] Sikozen ago 

No, inciting violence is no more part of free speech than yelling fire in a crowded room.

Trump stated what he wanted to do, not telling others what to do. I hate when people misuse that quote.

You realize that was in England, where the laws are different, right?

I do. This was just a case that was very obvious and everyone can understand what was happening. Don't pretend you don't know what I was referring to when I linked that. BPP, BLM, the BS college protests - all of these people are allowed to exacerbate racial tension and threaten violence against people, but this is perfectly acceptable as long as the people being threatened are white. This is a thing.

Yup, and like children, the Trump supporters feel for the bait, instead of being the better people they try to portray themselves as.

*fell. Also, yup - children. Guess they would have been better off to take a page out of those protestors who stabbed those KKK members, eh? Trump's supporters are being constantly singled out for daring to be public about their opinions. I think they've been pretty adult about it so far. I get that they're easy to pick on, but if people can get over protestors setting fires, robbing stores, shooting people, etc, I think they can get over this.

So then you probably deserve to get punched in the face multiple times a day because you probably do things in public that others disagree with?

If I walked around in a KKK outfit in the middle of Chicago, I would expect to get my ass beat. If I robbed a church in the middle of a wedding, I would expect to get my ass beat. It's using a little common sense to anticipate whether you are purposefully putting yourself in a bad situation to spread a message, and then determining if you feel the message outweighs the danger. If the message is more important, than you anticipate the reaction and prepare to deal with it.

Remember those chicks who decided to hike from Italy to the Middle East in wedding dresses as a message of peace? They felt the message outweighed the potential risks. And one of them was raped, murdered, and left on the side of the road mid-journey. Her parents are adamant that she would want to be remembered for the message she was trying to spread, not the way she died, but it's still there. This was a known, obvious risk that they felt they were... I don't know, immune from? And these antagonizers are the same way. They've never had to deal with real world consequences for being a jackass while surrounded by people who wouldn't tolerate that kind of BS, or who were flat out tired of the not-funny joke. Now they have. And they get to spend the rest of their lives explaining to people that they were stupid in a crowd and got a beat down for it. So brave.

Yeah, its called the law, not vigilante justice.

When you camouflage the harassment and terrorism you are being paid to promote as 'protesting', you get to work around the law. It's stupid to think people aren't going to try and find the same kind of work around. This wasn't 'vigilante justice', this was a few people who didn't like the KKK and the confederate flag. Not fucking Batman.

And the Soros people are succeeding because the Trump supporters are gullible morons that allow themselves to fall for it every time.

No, not really. And it's pretty depressing that you can acknowledge Soros' people are hired goons, not protestors, but that if their tactics work on people who are tired, frustrated, and annoyed they're 'gullible morons'. You're a moron, sir/madam. What a little troll.