[–] ElectricPurple 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Sadly this ham could be right because of vanity sizing. Fuck vanity sizing. I'm pretty much stuck with kid's clothes or baggy XS
[–] slugsrgr8t 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
For anyone wondering, city chic is a fat people store. A medium there is like a XXXL anywhere else.
[–] FruitTingle 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
City Chic is a store for mayo barges, I think their smallest size is (if this is australian) 14aus
So let's assume they've made 14 their "xs". A medium would be a size 18aus. Not anything to be proud of :/
[–] erythropoetin 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
So that's how big a medium is in US sizes. No wonder I could fit into kids' clothes when I was there.
[–] la_fupacabra 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
I would not fit into any of their clothes, they would fall off. That's insane. Good job vanity sizing.
EDIT:oh this is a fat chick store. That explains everything
[–] fabulousalpaca 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I'm sure she is a medium, what with vanity sizing and all that shit.
[–] Miesha 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Well I'm not surprised with vanity sizing. A S at Victoria Secret made me feel like I'm wearing a burlap sack. I really don't understand the need for vanity sizing. Rather than making regular people sub-zero, why don't they just continue to expand the number scale infinitely?
[–] AppleSlice ago
So this is why I can wear a size small for the first time in my life. :(