Extraracial marriage being the opposite of interracial marriage.
interracial marriage and procreation is harmful to white people as a group as it weakens whites numerically and weakens the power of whites relative to other racial and cultural groups.
But that's a complete non-issue. So what if there are less white people? So what if there are less black people? So what if there are less Asians? So what if there are less Arabs? As long as they aren't being literally slaughtered out of existence, who cares?
And as non-whites do generally see whites as a distinctive group based on being white, and worse, often bear hostility toward whites, it is facile to believe interracialism is going to be anything other than harmful to whites as a group or the remaining whites as individuals.
You don't combat racism by preventing the birth of people who could be racist, that would be that same logic as an sjw saying that white people shouldn't have kids who are white because 'muh all white people inherently hate black people'.
Interracialism is contributing to a situation where white people could become a small minority in America. Does anyone seriously think whites will be better off or even as well off at 10 or 20% of the population as 60 or 70%?
I don't understand why you're so concerned about numbers, so what if white people become a minority? Demographics change, that's just life.
[–] Joe_McCarthy [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
If one wishes to see the practical effects of whites as a small minority look to Haiti (race war ending in genocide), Zimbabwe (whites kicked off their farms), or present day South Africa (an increasingly unbearable environment). For that matter try being a poor white retiree in Detroit or most any heavily non-white neighborhood in the US. The day to day life will consist of bars on the windows, general fear, etc. And that's if things don't get massively worse.
At the very least the quality of life for white people will almost certainly decline as whites lose numbers and consequently power.
If one sees no problem with such an outcome there's little remaining to say now is there?
[–] faissaloo ago
The race war only started because of slavery, the 1804 Haiti massacre wasn't right in any way, but such things are bound to happen in such cases. There were underlying issues, and it in no way supports your conclusion.
Once again, this was the result of racial tensions, mostly due to the fact that whites, though the minority, were in charge of most of the government.
What you need to understand is that, if white people were being oppressed, and as a result did some stupid things, it would be indicative of a white majority somehow causing issues as it would be an oppressed majority causing issues.
Could you cite something to back this up? Because I've never actually heard a single bad thing about the experiences of whites in South Africa.
Again, there are underlying issues for this, though not really race based ones. Detroit is really quite impoverished. Bigotry and crime are rife where people are impoverished.
Probably not, at least in America, unless the whole police shooting people for being black doesn't stop, in which case there might be a chance of some brief fallout from pent up anger.