[–] 4414543? 0 points 20 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago
So what if he has a gun? Non-felon citizens of the United States are permitted to keep and bear arms, and the courts have determined they may do so in a concealed manner if they adhere to state regulations. Unless he was brandishing it or making threats, it doesn't matter one iota. If anything, I'd say he should've had a gun, considering she was trying to incite mob violence against him.
[–] OneFifthHaikus 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Pretty sure Universities and high schools and government buildings are special cases. Last I heard Texas allowed carrying on universities though?
[–] SherlockHomeslice 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
"He definitely had a gun!"
"Well he could have had a gun!"
anyone with your dumb fucking logic could have a gun at any time. he has a scary small camera and he looks scary so he definitely MUST have a gun.
[–] 4414835? 0 points 17 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago (edited ago)
If the student had a gun and Professor Crick feared he might use it, her smug, condescending behavior followed by her dismissive call for "some muscle" to get rid of him would put the lives of the protesters at risk.
Lying swampdonkey bullshit. I expect nothing less from a woman with a PhD. in professional victimhood.
[–] darkcharp 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
aka crybullies. Abuse, harassment, and even rape have become codes for harpies lying to attack while simultaneously being a victim. Sucks for the honest victims.