1
-1

[–] Gerplunckamo [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

muh shills, they're fucking with muh hugbox reeeee

How about you provide a rebuttal that doesn't reek of brain-suffocating tinfoil paranoia?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] Gerplunckamo [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

all-too-eager to heap glowing praise upon mediocre offerings, or who acts as an apologist for glaring flaws.

Are you sure you're describing a shill, and not yourself? You're trying your hardest to defend an impoverished, underdeveloped, underpopulated, broke, repressive authoritarian dictatorship whose leader thinks nuclear weapons are an appropriate response to terrorism. Based on your description, that would make you the "dirty cunt shill".

[–] [deleted] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] Gerplunckamo [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Actually it does have facts, backed up by sources. Like this one, this one, and this one.

Facts don't stop being facts just because they send you into an autismal fit and hurt your fee fees.