0
1

[–] XPS 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Fuck this!

0
9

[–] loquito 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

She will be appointed as a reward for not indicting Hillary.

0
6

[–] scrotums 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

There have been many justices with no judicial experience.

0
0

[–] Clitorally_retarded ago 

No constitutional requirement to even be an attorney.

1
3

[–] 4346121? [S] 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Even more disturbing. It looks like nominating justices with no judicial experience is a common practice amongst progressives of the 20th century, even ones I admire, like Roosevelt.

1
0

[–] TheRealVladimirPutin 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

John Jay had a lot of important experience. I would honestly prefer someone like Ted Cruz on the SCOTUS than someone who has gone from Preftige Lol School --> Big Law Firm --> USDOJ --> U.S. Dist. Court --> Circuit Court.

0
2

[–] scrotums 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It was a common practice among all presidents of the 20th century.

[–] [deleted] 4 points 1 point (+5|-4) ago 

[Deleted]

1
11

[–] Dashippy 1 point 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

She's black, a woman, and would be the first black woman. That's all the experience she needs. Reading through that makes it sound like an incredible political move. She's not left-leaning enough for the GOP to attack her on that so attacking her just makes them look racist and sexist.

4
14

[–] Rommel79 4 points 14 points (+18|-4) ago 

They can attack her on the fact that she has no experience. SC justices should be scholars, not someone who fits some stupid ass racial quota.

1
10

[–] DickHertz 1 point 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

Oh like Obama the Harvard professor on constitutional law you mean?