0
0

[–] ghotioninabarrel ago 

I'd say that if ever there are no ongoing arcs then no problem, make a post and see whether people want one at that time.

If there are any arcs at all that would be messed with though, then no.

0
0

[–] Cutsprocket ago 

I think people are ok to play fast and loose with their own time skips as necessary. I myself have used a couple and am beginning an arc right now that the time skip would get in the way of.

0
0

[–] 4291776? ago 

I like this idea, but I think we need a few days (or a week full Age) notice.

0
0

[–] NobleParadox ago 

You have no idea how scared I am of what the Deva will do in 10 years.

0
0

[–] Dumb_Comment_Bot ago 

Good btw? I wasn't sure how to do a PU other than this: http://imgh.us/gaea_political_7.svg

0
0

[–] Urukuk [S] ago  (edited ago)

Yeah, the slashed line is good. If you want future reference for Chloran lands within the PU, just use this.

P.S. If this time skip suggestion is accepted, there will be a lot of new Fulcrid cities. Hope that being the only one doing the map isn't too much work though.

0
0

[–] Urukuk [S] ago 

@NobleParadox @silvester @Cutsprocket I need meta tag for this.

0
1

[–] bobusdoleus 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Don't think it's a great time for such a thing. Not for me, at least - I kind of have some hands in some pies right now. And it's very unlikely to be a good time for everyone at once, I think, so it's been basically individual imperative how much time passes for any given set of players. Wibbly, but it works, I think.

0
1

[–] Arotaes_Forgehammer 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Ohmigod. A justification for a space program appearing out of nowhere and the jihad succeeding? Yes pls

0
0

[–] bobusdoleus ago 

Neither of those is in the spirit of 'nothing important happening.'

0
1

[–] ghotioninabarrel 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Nope, I'd say anything that happens during the time skip would have to be begun beforehand and reasonable in that time. And also can't include new interactions with anyone.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)