[–] samwisekoi 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 4.8 years ago
But if you read the entire article, the author concludes that this is due to bias AGAINST women.
It takes some pretty fabulous wordsmithing and use of data to accomplish this feat but:
All overwhelmingly good, right? However...
All positive, with that one exception, so... misogyny!
[–] chrimata 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 4.8 years ago
Out seems like a lot of people in this comment section didn't actually read the article.
That being said, wow I didn't know that many people used Google+
[–] samwisekoi 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
But if you read the entire article, the author concludes that this is due to bias AGAINST women.
It takes some pretty fabulous wordsmithing and use of data to accomplish this feat but:
All overwhelmingly good, right? However...
All positive, with that one exception, so... misogyny!