0
4

[–] confused_teabagger 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

What kind of fucking school are you in where you can actually have free speech?

At my university, I would be up in front of a dean trying to explain myself (and hoping not to get expelled) if I even attempted to correlate biology with any human trait.

0
3

[–] Bilbo_Swaggins 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

The closest I've come is saying that women are less interested in engineering on average. That one is obvious and inoffensive yet the reactions I got were Tumble levels of exaggerated and, well, stupid.

0
2

[–] eagleshigh [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Im actually in community college. I couldn't believe noone said anything to me. Though, my class doesn't seem to be the brightest. Myself and one other guy are the only ones who follow politics.

0
2

[–] confused_teabagger 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

People in my University get defense if you insist on using male pronouns while having a discussion or show a presentation. Insinuating that there is more than skin color different between races might get called a hate crime there.

The hilarious thing is that they all know. When we peer-review papers, it is obvious that the few niggers there, should not be there. We have Asians that have only recently learned English, submitting better work.

What's worse, is that if I submitted the work that these niggers get away with, I would be out on my ass!

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] ClaytonBigsby2016 ago 

From my experience, everyone hates niggers. Its not until they get in upper levels of academia that they start becoming true nigger lovers and totally blind to niggerdom and start justifying nigger murder, rape, robbery, etc

0
1

[–] staroath 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Holy fuck. Actual freethought in a college.

0
3

[–] Bilbo_Swaggins 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Disallowing women from the military shouldn't be offensive.

"NO! WE NEED WOMEN RISKING THEIR LIVES! SOMEHOW WE WILL RATIONALISE THIS AS BEING GOOD FOR WOMEN!!1!"

Wat.

Btw, if I were to refute the idea that women should be in the miltary I'd use Fred Reed's articles on it and the recent heavily indicting statistics as my starting points for research. Don't bother arguing against women in noncombat roles, you probably won't win that argument even if you're right because no one will admit that you are. Just talk about why it's retarded beyond all measure to have women in combat roles.

As for a race and IQ article, feel free to culturally appropriate ideas from Eyferth the Cat or any of my comments. Obviously don't steal chunks of sentences from it or you'll get caught with plagiarism, but feel free to "draw inspiration" from it without feeling the need to cite it. I mention this because essays typically bring up their own counterpoint and then do their best to refute it, and I think that my article might serve as a useful springboard for refuting race denialism.

Feel free to bounce ideas off of me, and I can edit as well if you want. I've been wanting to do academic HBD work with someone else for a while now.

Either way this isn't a suggestion as much as a demand backed by a threat of violence, I will defenestrate you (easily my favorite word, lol) if you don't send/ post it for me to read, or if you don't give us updates on what it's like to be a vocal realist in modern academia. I'm very curious where this will go.

0
2

[–] 1Icemonkey 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Make sure you emphasize the point that they raised the IQ standard for retard when they found most jiggaboos fit within those parameters. This one always kills me and helps prove all the other points. You own the discussion at that point. But I'm sure you know all about this stuff and don't need my help. Good luck and most of all,have fun! Edit: additionally, I disagree with women being in combat roles. The fact that they are considering a draft inclusion for women makes me sick. We should honor and protect our women, not put them in harms way.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] eagleshigh [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I agree. If it's a super human, mannish woman who can do everything single thing a man can do, let her in.

But the average American woman? Top. Kek.

The left has done most anything they can to make us believe we are blank slates. That biology doesn't matter to sex. That anything a man can so "a woman can do better". Fuck that. Biology says other wise.

So women have the same upper body strength as men? Etc etc.

0
0

[–] Jigganiggaboo ago 

http://www.wiu.edu/coehs/military_science/physical_training/APFT%20Standards.htm

Here you go op. This is the army apft standards.it consist of push ups sit ups and 2 mile run. There in this chart it lists male and female standards. The lowest standard is 60% for males 60% is a females 100% so there you have it. The standards for females in the army were lowered. Hope you like it.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] eagleshigh [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I did specify in my post to the other user that women specifically shouldn't be in combat. Hell, I think that women should be nowhere near the battlefield.

Right. Changing the rules means you didn't so it as it was previously specified means you didn't really do anything.

0
0

[–] ClaytonBigsby2016 ago  (edited ago)

Women being in the army makes just about as much sense to me as niggers not being extinct yet

0
0

[–] ShakaDindu ago 

I think women can be in the military, but not in combat roles, and not in any critical decision making roles. Women tend to have a decision making and value process that isn't suited to winning at all costs, which is required for an effective military leader.

Summary of differences.

I think showing the difference between men's and women's ethics would compliment your subject nicely.

0
0

[–] LokkaKhat ago 

Apparently I'm either not a woman or I'm an alien, because that shit doesn't fit me.

0
0

[–] ShakaDindu ago 

Then you're a rare gem. Note that in the scenarios presented not all women failed to prioritize logic in decision making, but there was a nontrivial difference between men and women, which would undermine the confidence of troops serving under women.

I should probably have emphasized the phrase "tend to have" a little more, because I don't mean to concretely disqualify all women from certain roles, but in general treating all women as equal to all men in matters of warfare is a bad idea.

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)