[–] Super_Cooper 4 points -4 points 0 points (+0|-4) ago
While I can sympathize with their actions, I cannot condone them. We have the rule of law and a right to a speedy and fair trial in America for this very reason. Some of those niggers may have been innocent. I cannot abide by even one innocent man in a thousand being lynched in this way. We must maintain the moral high ground, if we lose it, then we have lost ourselves.
[–] YallJusRaycis 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I don't condone them burning down perfectly good courthouses. They could have dragged the coons out and executed them without causing property damage.
[–] eagleshigh 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Genetic pacification is how states formed in Europe.
This situation began to change in the 11th century throughout Western Europe with a growing consensus that the wicked should be punished so that the good may live in peace. Courts imposed the death penalty more and more often and, by the late Middle Ages, were condemning to death between 0.5 and 1.0% of all men of each generation, with perhaps just as many offenders dying at the scene of the crime or in prison while awaiting trial. Meanwhile, the homicide rate plummeted from the 14th century to the 20th, decreasing forty-fold. The pool of violent men dried up until most murders occurred under conditions of jealousy, intoxication, or extreme stress.
The immediate causes were legal and cultural: harsher punishment and a shift in popular attitudes toward the violent male—who went from hero to zero. This new social environment, however, also tended to favor the survival and reproduction of individuals who would less easily resort to violence on their own initiative. Given that aggressive behavior is moderately to highly heritable, as shown by twin studies, is it possible that the high rate of capital punishment gradually removed propensities for violence from the gene pool? This hypothesis is modeled by Frost and Harpending, who conclude that such natural selection could explain a little over half of the reduction in the homicide rate. The rest of the decline may have partly resulted from violent men being increasingly marginalized in society and on the marriage market.
http://www.unz.com/pfrost/western-europe-state-formation-and-genetic-pacification-3/
I also theorize that a part of the lower black crime rate is due to the amount of niggers made good. Getting rid of the "bad niggers" and leaving the more docile ones, maybe dropped their crime rate. It happen, imo, by taking some of the criminal genes (?), or those more predisposed to crime out of the gene pool.
With the above article by Frost and Harpending, it's a sensible theory.
[–] Super_Cooper 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
That makes a lot of sense. I am fine with sentencing rapists and murderers to death, nigger or not. I am not fine with mob justice and lynching. It is a violation of Anglo Saxon values and I will not betray them nor condone others for doing so.
[–] Super_Cooper 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago
That may be, but we must have a rule of law. We must keep our actions consistent with our values. If we believe that all men have a right to a fair trial, then we must give all men a fair trial and hold those who fail to do so accountable.
[–] Mortifera ago
The good ole days are long gone...