[–]flyawayhigh0 points
3 points
3 points
(+3|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Another negative piece about Hillary is back on top of v/politics, and as usual, it's from a Republican partisan source.
The bad taste is hypocrisy. National Review has no problem with the speaking fees unless it is a Democrat, and particularly Hillary Clinton taking them. In fact, National Review's tendency is to support these "private" deals.
I know from being here that most of us in the v/politics section of Voat are independents, so why are we letting ourselves be used in such a transparently partisan way? Honest critical pieces about Hillary can certainly be found. It's not like the partisan sites are the only ones reporting on her. In fact, the nonpartisan sites do a much better job.
Take a look at some other National Review articles which you can find in the search engine.
"Dick Cheney: CIA Torture Report ‘Full of Crap’" -- the site does nothing but repeat Cheney's assertions.
"Bush Didn’t Lie." This one's rich. National Review still peddling WMDs!
Seriously, you can't find something critical of Hillary that's not a partisan hit piece?
Don't forget. She left the White House "dead broke." And by "dead broke" she meant they didn't want to spend the money on solid gold plumbing fixtures in their new house in New York.
[–] [deleted] 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago
[–] flyawayhigh 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Another negative piece about Hillary is back on top of v/politics, and as usual, it's from a Republican partisan source.
The bad taste is hypocrisy. National Review has no problem with the speaking fees unless it is a Democrat, and particularly Hillary Clinton taking them. In fact, National Review's tendency is to support these "private" deals.
I know from being here that most of us in the v/politics section of Voat are independents, so why are we letting ourselves be used in such a transparently partisan way? Honest critical pieces about Hillary can certainly be found. It's not like the partisan sites are the only ones reporting on her. In fact, the nonpartisan sites do a much better job.
Take a look at some other National Review articles which you can find in the search engine.
"Dick Cheney: CIA Torture Report ‘Full of Crap’" -- the site does nothing but repeat Cheney's assertions.
"Bush Didn’t Lie." This one's rich. National Review still peddling WMDs!
Seriously, you can't find something critical of Hillary that's not a partisan hit piece?
[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)