[–] Crensch 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Yet, the moderators here have not handled criticism from the users very well in my opinion.
The "users" critical of us are by and large the same vocal morons that try to find anything at all wrong with PV, and claim to be speaking for the users of voat, while not actually having earned the weight they claim to have.
You control the narrative of the sub with disingenuous tags, and critical contents are more often than not met with rudeness and baseless accusations.
We reduce the amount of bullshit people might think are legitimate posts by using flairs. This is a service to those who would rather read useful information here.
Keep in mind that your subscribers are only a small minority of voaters.
Are you asserting that other people do not check up on the happenings of voat while not being subscribed, or are you just making an obvious observation on the number of our subscribers?
Tell me, why is it that people like techius require an alt army in order to combat this "small minority" when your supposed legislation subverse could just as easily have enough to combat the subscribers here, were it worth the 1s and 0s it was made of?
Much of the user base sees you as a brigade sub.
The same users saying the same thing over and over again like Faux News pundits who don't actually need to do anything but repeat the same thing over and over for their subscribers to believe it?
I'd give voaters more credit than that, but if you think they're all sheeple, we'll just have to disagree.
That's largely because how the moderators here act.
Yeah? What, exactly, do they do that makes your implied majority of users think us a brigade sub?
You do know that a parse of this subverse would show that it's only people like you and techius that claim that, right?
Very, very few others have said anything like it, and I see new usernames popping up every day, like @dungles, pointing out that your assertions about that are complete bullshit.
[–] mamwad 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
It's honestly impossible to tell what the opinion of the majority of users on voat want voat to be like. There are too many alt accounts floating around out there. That's another issue I've been discussing on /v/voatcongress. It's best to assume that any group with an agenda had a sockpuppet brigade either behind it or against it. Honestly, I think making records of suspicious voating activity public would work.
[–] 4060502? 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
I feel like this is untrue. I haven't seen any but a small group repeat that and honestly , having read your posts before I'm disappointed to see you repeat it too. It probably means nothing to you but I felt I had to say it.