And while you have a point, I'll say what I said in the original thread. I don't think the punishment for violating the user agreement should be doxxing. Perhaps this information could have been given to Atko and Puttitout privately.
Anyway, my main point is that obviously people are going to disagree about what should be done about any problem the community has. Someone's we aren't going to come to a resolution on a particular matter, but we should at least make an honest attempt. It's why I created /v/voatcongress, and I really do wish more people of varying opinions would populate the sub do we don't have to have these discussions elsewhere. If PV is going to be the executive branch of voat, maybe we need to develop checks and balances.
[–] mamwad 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
First, sorry for saying "you." That's not fair.
And while you have a point, I'll say what I said in the original thread. I don't think the punishment for violating the user agreement should be doxxing. Perhaps this information could have been given to Atko and Puttitout privately.
Anyway, my main point is that obviously people are going to disagree about what should be done about any problem the community has. Someone's we aren't going to come to a resolution on a particular matter, but we should at least make an honest attempt. It's why I created /v/voatcongress, and I really do wish more people of varying opinions would populate the sub do we don't have to have these discussions elsewhere. If PV is going to be the executive branch of voat, maybe we need to develop checks and balances.
[–] Crensch 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Executive branch?
The only power we have is due to people in general trusting what we have to say. The moment we go off the script, we have nothing.
The "checks and balances" are the users of this website. Any assertion to the contrary is pure bullshit.