0
0

[–] tosss ago 

Most of the dem's I've talked to about this are against her. I wonder if the republicans will be able to put up someone better than jeb to counter her.

0
1

[–] cake 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Warren will get the nomination, not this loser who has had lots of time to show her colors. Warren has better ties to Wall St and isn't damaged goods yet. Not that she's any better (cough, asbestos, cough).

0
2

[–] DoubleOhGadget [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I think the biggest obstacle that's standing in Warren's way is the fact that she's not even fucking running.

0
0

[–] cake ago 

Yet. 2015 is only a third over.

0
2

[–] cincinnatus 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Once again it seems we are heading for Giant Douche v. Turd Sandwich.

0
2

[–] AnalogRocks 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I disagree. Although Rand Paul isn't a perfect candidate by any means he's far better than anyone else out there.

0
1

[–] cincinnatus 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I feel like that is not saying much.

0
2

[–] lofalexandria 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

"Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today’s warfare, victims. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children." - Hillary Rodham Clinton

Conference on domestic violence in San Salvador, El Salvador (17 November 1998). http://clinton3.nara.gov/WH/EOP/First_Lady/html/generalspeeches/1998/19981117.html

0
4

[–] 51rH0n3y84d93r 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

What about the husbands, fathers and sons who are killed? Are they secondary victims, or do they not count once they're dead??

0
3

[–] lofalexandria 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Exactly.

0
4

[–] catechumen 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If I could morally support violence...

0
6

[–] mscomies 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

If it comes down to another Clinton vs. Bush, I'm voting libertarian. Fuck them both.

0
2

[–] DoubleOhGadget [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Isn't Paul the libertarian candidate?

0
2

[–] mscomies 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

No, Paul is running Republican, at least for now.

0
7

[–] ClitoralCommander 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

This might be the best opportunity that the country will have to get rid of this ridiculous two party system that we've got.

0
2

[–] brody9311 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

How so?

0
7

[–] rwbj 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Hillary vs Jeb. Would the voter turnout be above or below 50%?

0
2

[–] 51rH0n3y84d93r 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'd say below 30%; why bother at that point?

0
13

[–] M_C_Dillinger 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

Can anyone imagine the dark times we'd be in for with a feminist president? Obama was complacent with being in charge of a surveillance state and Hillary would use it to "address cyber bullying."

0
2

[–] cake 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I've been telling everyone that there's going to be a female president one way or another, and that all this recent fake feminism is getting ready for her. She will take the American Internet's anonymity away and block sites for being "problematic". She will be the end of the American Tech Industry.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] smokratez 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I wouldn't be able to find much to argue that Obama isn't a feminist president.

1
7

[–] 133036? 1 point 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

How would we be in "the dark times"?

0
12

[–] M_C_Dillinger 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

think about it.

Imagine a president who not only listens and believes but acts out on rape hysteria but is willing to take action against the made-up issue of cyber bullying.

Hillary would campaign to turn America into Sweden.