0
6

[–] confused_teabagger 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Damn! That whole thread had a delicious red-pill flavor.

It was almost like the cucks, SJWs, and tag-alongs just didn't have any real comeback for this particular crime.

Now if only we could get them to have the same clarity on the other 75% of crime ...

0
3

[–] gov5000 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Fucking niggers

0
2

[–] meltingpotofhambone 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

White lives matter! Okay goys now start looting and burning your own cities to the ground!

0
0

[–] corbinawhile ago 

Looks like the SJW's were commenting on the grammar of the article since they can't discuss black on white crime, but they still have to post some kind of comment.

0
1

[–] eagleshigh 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I agree with this.

Shouldn't journalism be written so it can be understood by the general populace. Scientific studies are written in very coarse english that the vast majority of people can't understand unless they are in that field of study. However, those studies are for the most part only relevant to that subset, whereas general journalism must be able to be understood by the average person regardless of education. That being said "bad guys" is probably a bit to far in the other direction but better that than indecipherable legal jargon.

The average person can't read scientific papers.

0
0

[–] eagleshigh ago 

>jewitt

0
0

[–] blackguard19 ago 

Are they starting to realize that every time the media reports another violent attack by "teens" they're really talking about a pack of nogs?

0
0

[–] Hillaryscrackzits ago 

In Memfrica, this happens every single day.

0
0

[–] Fuck_SRS ago 

Good, more of these crimes need to make the front page. Now if only, when playing "reverse the race" the cucks in the comments would stop referring to a 23 year old black man as a kid.