1
-1

[–] casper 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I was trying to illustrate the fallacy of the logic at play. There is no way to win this game if you are the accused. I could have used any fabricated accusation. Every part of the way I say it presumes your guilt without the need for any evidence.

1
-1

[–] klobos 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

If you can't prove that something you created won't harm the environment or the people consuming it in the long or short term, then it would be wise and logical to continue doing intense long studies until you know for certain. The potential for GMO crops to destabilize the environment or end up being harmful to humans in the long term is a real threat. Risking humans or our environment for profit just isn't' worth it until, like I said, you prove they won't harm either. Just use some common sense.

1
-1

[–] casper 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Please describe for me the study design that would prove anything 100% safe forever.