7
5

[–] Jarmey 7 points 5 points (+12|-7) ago 

That is a positive development. Good news for once.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

3
-3

[–] AlphaWookie 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

It is a faggot that likes smelling farts. Being anti-Americanis all they do.

[–] [deleted] 2 points 20 points (+22|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

0
7

[–] Iforgotmy_other_acct 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Here's the full text of the oath, for the curious:

"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

12
-8

1
7

[–] Mad_Dog91 1 point 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

Power to the people

1
12

[–] DerpExpress 1 point 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

Why did they remove that?

1
2

[–] Alias_Unknown 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

My guess would be something more along the lines of conscientious objector. They mention religious reasoning as well.

But the article makes it sound like you can instead vow to help out in a non combative role. Which to me seems pretty legit. Not everyone is for for combat, but messengers, orderly's and transport (just to name a few) are all equally valuable roles in a situation that this oath has been envisioned for.

3
4

[–] dv1155 3 points 4 points (+7|-3) ago 

Because the left, who rabidly hates this country, is hoping they'll take up arms against this nation.

5
6

[–] theburntsausage 5 points 6 points (+11|-5) ago 

probly because they cannot be trusted.

0
1

[–] forgetmyname 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

something something naturalized citizens no longer have the right to bear arms.

0
9

[–] scrotums [S] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

But they're trusted enough to become citizens. Which means they can bear arms.

They're just no longer to swear that they will.

[–] [deleted] 8 points 29 points (+37|-8) ago 

[Deleted]

0
9

[–] rumathlete_1 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

When my grandpa enlisted in WWII it wasnt just because our nation was attacked it was because he lost 6 friends at pearl harbor and wanted revenge and joined the navy for the fact he would be fighting the japs. He was a kind and loving man to everyone, all religions, and all races, except the Japaneses.