[–] cpoakes 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
The Sanders campaign will remain suspended until it provides the DNC with a full explanation of the episode and provides proof that any accessed data has been discarded.
Who's the idiot? The DNC or the journalist? It is impossible to prove the data has been discarded. All the campaign can do is issue assurances the data has been removed from their systems. I expect the fired staffer departed with a complete copy of the data set, but there is no way to know.
[–] AKnightAlone 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
[–] the_spectre 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Candidates' voter details are separated by "a firewall."
That word doesn't mean what they think it means. I have no idea what that statement entails. Are they...on separate servers and networks, protected by firewalls? Or are they "firewalls" on the same server? What would that mean?
[–] Iforgotmy_other_acct 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
The Queen-Regent knows what's hers.
[–] Hey_Sunshine 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Like Hillary has any room to talk about unauthorized computer usage! Fuck this bitch with rusty razor wire!
[–] [deleted] 0 points 14 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago (edited ago)
[–] ot_to_know 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
This was a carrot, who could resist seeing another campaigns information. Especially because you didn't have to 'hack' anything, it was 'accidentally' made available.
[–] [deleted] 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago (edited ago)
[–] epsilona01 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
We're going to keep seeing a lot more of that until she steals the primary. She doesn't have to use political ads or speeches to attack Sanders, she has other ways.