1
-1

[–] Bilbo_Swaggins 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

You argue long after you've been proven wrong.

There may be ways to reduce transmission of STDs, but herpes isn't the only one that can be passed that way and no, condoms do not stop HIV either.

Conservative =/= libertarian you braindead. Besides, do I look like a fucking neocon to you? Someone who wants a government that actively pursues White interests isn't against them pursing such social policies.

Food poisoning isn't an infectious disease. Again, your logic is beyond faulty. STDs are TRANSMITTED. You can't give food poisoning to other people- and food poisoning doesn't stick with you for the rest of your damn life. On top of that your 1 in 6 stat is in spite of Americans visiting restaurants astronomically more often than brothels. You have equated a mountain to a molehill without even having an iota of a clue of how absurd that is.

Extramarital sexual contact isn't guaranteed to be with someone whose job it is to fuck virtually everyone else in town. Again, your analogies are beyond illogical.

And then you say that we should make it legal because you want to do it. Contrary to what you may imagine, I for one do not make social policy based on the desires of irrational degenerates on the internet, least of all when they're so self obsessed that they think something should be illegal or legal based on whether they want to do it.

Okay, you're comparing being addicted to alcohol to hiring hookers. If one were to compare sex to drinking and posit that addiction is an instance of drinking that should not occur and prostitution is an instance of sex that should not occur I would agree, and posit that we might pursue social policies that limit the amount of addiction and prostitution which occur in the country.

And for the umpteenth time, we're not neocons. You're on an alt right forum. You will not find cheeseburger Republicans here.

Cars and guns are ethical by most relevant standards but prostitution is still up for debate. In my opinion it devalues sex and the people having it. So yet again your analogies are shit.

1
0

[–] WhiteSoIMustBeRacist 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

condoms do not stop HIV either.

[citation needed]

Provide a reliable source of what the failure rate is of HIV transmission when condoms are used properly.

Conservative =/= libertarian

Agreed. But both believe in small government and limited regulations (except for the conservatives who want regulations where their ancient myth's ethics are concerned).

Food poisoning isn't an infectious disease. Again, your logic is beyond faulty. STDs are TRANSMITTED. You can't give food poisoning to other people- and food poisoning doesn't stick with you for the rest of your damn life.

Irrelevant, the practice of food handling is inherently unsafe and should be made illegal. (sarcasm if you didn't notice it)

On top of that your 1 in 6 stat is in spite of Americans visiting restaurants astronomically more often than brothels. You have equated a mountain to a molehill without even having an iota of a clue of how absurd that is.

Again, irrelevant. Unless you can show that the risk of getting sick from legal controlled prostitution such as in a Nevada brothel is substantially higher than the risk of eating at a restaurant on any given day.

Extramarital sexual contact isn't guaranteed to be with someone whose job it is to fuck virtually everyone else in town.

LOL, you must have had a shitty high school and college experience.

And then you say that we should make it legal because you want to do it. Contrary to what you may imagine, I for one do not make social policy based on the desires of irrational degenerates on the internet, least of all when they're so self obsessed that they think something should be illegal or legal based on whether they want to do it.

Pointless blabbering. You want to deny individuals to engage in an activity because you don't like it. Fuck off. How about this? How about you not telling me what I should be doing and I don't do the same for you?

Okay, you're comparing being addicted to alcohol to hiring hookers. If one were to compare sex to drinking and posit that addiction is an instance of drinking that should not occur and prostitution is an instance of sex that should not occur I would agree, and posit that we might pursue social policies that limit the amount of addiction and prostitution which occur in the country.

Irrelevant. You are still preventing >all< people from accessing an activity that they would like to engage in, safely, because (by your argument) some individuals are irresponsible. Your argument of "some men are married" is a big load of fucking crap right from the start, and you know it.

Cars and guns are ethical by most relevant standards

LOL Sure. "guns are ethical by most relevant standards". PIck up a fucking newspaper, and you'll find a lot of people will disagree with you.

Here is a simple rule to live by, don't tell me what to do and I won't tell you what to do? Naa, you assholes need to get all up in other people's shit and force your "morality" on the rest of us. Fuck off.

0
0

[–] Bilbo_Swaggins ago  (edited ago)

"Condom use cannot provide absolute protection against any STD."

I'm not a neocon. I don't believe in the same "government we claim is small but actually conducts massive surveillance ops on its own people and kill millions of sand niggers for Israel." I believe in a government large enough to protect its citizens while still allowing for freedom of speech, rule of law, a bill of rights, and other such Western essentials. I am not "small government" and, as usual, you are strawmanning hard.

That's entirely fucking relevant. Restaurants give you a bug that makes you sick for 24 hours or less. Brothels can give you fucking AIDS and run the risk of doing so even when it's done "responsibly". That stays with you for life, spreads to others, and can even be given by a mother to a baby during birth. No rational person would compare food poisoning to fucking AIDS.

Even if the risk were higher, the consequences are wildly different as I've pointed out multiple fucking times now.

And you still haven't refuted me: ordinary sexual contact =/= prostitution because a prostitute is under virtually all circumstances paid to fucking essentially anyone.

"How about you not telling me what I should be doing and I don't do the same for you?" Oh, so anarchy then? Locke would like a fucking word with you. Whoever writes a Bill of Rights tells people what they can do. And I don't consider your natural right to be a degenerate towards the top of my list.

No, I don't think it should be legal for married men to pay whores to suck them off because they're bored with their wife or just don't care enough about their family not to.

Really? No, really? We don't have a gun problem, we have a NIGGER problem. Don't tell me you consider armed, psychologically stable White men to be a threat to your safety.