[–] Gigan 0 points 52 points 52 points (+52|-0) ago
Which has nothing to do with the Paris attacks. These fuckers are just using it as an excuse to push their big-brother police state. It is despicable to use a tragedy like this to restrict the freedoms of your citizens, and also do nothing to actually protect them against these attacks. I don't know shit about French politics, but hopefully someone over there fights this.
[–] [deleted] 1 point 14 points 15 points (+15|-1) ago
[–] pepepepepe ago
Sometimes people just exploit tragedy for their own personal agendas. Not everything is a false flag.
However it is very suspicious that a robust, privacy-invading surveillance network failed to pick these guys up. But then again never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
[–] HoneyNutStallmans 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago (edited ago)
I don't know shit about French politics, but hopefully someone over there fights this.
Wasn't the Universal Declaration of Human Rights signed in Paris or something?
Article 19.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
I'm guessing there would be a legal conflict in French law anyway.
[–] phatnice 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Most european countries have a "Consitutional Court" like US has the Supreme Court. Each law is analyzed there if it's consititional or not before being passed. If they give it a go, then it's nothing that the citizen can do even if in every elementary logic it's against the consitution.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 32 points 32 points (+32|-0) ago
[–] HoneyNutStallmans 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
On the other hand, if that pushes people to IP-based services, great!
[–] HoneyNutStallmans 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Hm.... just where else is it that something like Tor is banned...
CHINA?
Derp, they mention that in the article. I don't even bother reading since I generally understand the implications just from the title and also get the same stories from elsewhere.
[–] thefedisascam 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
How about people instead speak out about why the west/nato is being the air cover for ISIS.
[–] Voxxe 3 points 2 points 5 points (+5|-3) ago
The solution is simple, remove all male Muslims. But that is not PC, so instead we have to surrender all our freedoms to not be evil xenophobes. Hey, if all the immigrants were high-elves, I'd be a xenophile. This taboo against judgement, otherwise known as discrimination, is the downfall of all civilization.
[–] TheMasterSword 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
Hey, there was a female muslim terrorist in the San Bernardino shootings that just happened, no need to be sexist
[–] Voxxe 3 points -3 points 0 points (+0|-3) ago (edited ago)
Yes and that female terrorist was married to a male terrorist. This might be hard to grasp in this age of lies but women are passive and submissive when compared to men who are proactive and aggressive. There wouldn't be any female Muslims for long without male Muslims.
[–] DolphinPiss 2 points 13 points 15 points (+15|-2) ago
Let's not curb uncontrolled unvetted Muslim immigration, let's instead infringe on our citizens rights to privacy. Great fucking going.
[–] 51rH0n3y84d93r 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Gotta have that sweet, sweet blackmail.