0
1

[–] Crashmarik 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

See what happens when you try to be nice to people on the internet.

bending science

VS

The iceland volcano eruption kicked up about 0.5 teragrams of black carbon, climate models were spot on.

I must say It's a good thing we survived the collapse of our civilization and ecology, or are you just throwing out a phenomena that had been well known since Krakatoa as an experimental test ? And trying to use that as validation ?

Feel free to blather on and make more irrelevant comparison. I will greatly appreciate your re-parsing things I say into entirely different statements.

1
-1

[–] 9-11 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

maybe you should stop attacking carl sagan? or show some actual evidence for your attacks.

0
1

[–] Crashmarik 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

maybe you should stop attacking carl sagan? or show some actual evidence for your attacks.

http://www.nytimes.com/1990/01/23/science/nuclear-winter-theorists-pull-back.html?pagewanted=all

SINCE 1983, scientists have been bitterly divided over whether a nuclear war is likely to result in a catastrophic global chilling. But the five scientists who introduced the term ''nuclear winter'' now acknowledge that they overestimated its severity, and their concession appears to have moderated the longstanding debate.

Maybe you should try to know a little about what you are talking about.