[–] Damndirtyape [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The only time I worry about pit bulls is when a nigger is walking it. Of course then, I'm still more worried about the niggers impulse control than the pit bull.
[–] blackguard19 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The difference is society has accepted the obvious differences among dog breeds and some apartment complexes like mine don't allow aggressive dogs like pit bulls. Pit bull owners bitching about how their pit bull is sweet and their pit pull is nice and would never hurt anyone remind me of liberal nigger apologists.
[–] Damndirtyape [S] ago
Pit bulls do have strong bites. Before them Rottweilers were at the top of the list, another nigger favorite. Before you get a dog, you have to know how they act. Mine gets energetic and protective, so I run him a lot and let him socialize with other dogs. If I never did those two things and kept him locked up in the house all day, I can see how he'd get neurotic and lash out at strangers.
[–] Big_Black_Negro 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Funny most niggers also tend to own dogs like that!
[–] redpilldessert 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Only on here would I expect to see such a post. It's truth of course, but the rest of the world is FAR too blinkered to even consider such a parallel.
Kudos.
[–] redpilldessert 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Nah, it's just they're kept down by the Labradors, Collies and Alsatians of the world.
[–] RedditDead2005-2015 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
You can never use facts and statistics to point out that blacks disproportionately commit more crimes and murders because those things are racist.
[–] draaaak 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago (edited ago)
I'm not trying to dispute the stats or statements you've posted, but there are some things worth considering, some of which you already hinted at...
The media mostly only reports on bites from specific breeds. A few decades ago it was Dobermans, then it was German Shepherds, then Rottweilers, and now it's Pits. All these dogs have something in common, they are strong, highly intelligent, loyal, and trainable. They excel in these departments more so than most other breeds, which is why they are selected for protection/defense services.
Ever notice how the media likes to demonize firearms every chance they get so they can push the gun control agenda? Well, they seem to do the same thing with dog's used for defense. The way the Pit Bull is portrayed by the media is much like how they use the AK47 to symbolize the "evil" of firearms. And Pits and AKs also have quite a bit in common. They are easily identified by silhouette alone, cheap, rugged, dependable, and powerful. They are the perfect dog for people who need a guard dog, but can't afford a Doberman or a Shepherd, just as the AK is the ideal firearm for the poor, low skilled, and desperate. This comparison is not a criticism of either Pits or AKs, they are both popular for very good reasons.
There are different lists out there of the dog breeds which are guilty of the most bites. It can be hard to find, but I have seen top 10 lists featuring Poodles, Goldens, and Labs in the top 3 spots. Having worked with dogs for several years, I can confirm that these "family" dogs are rarely trained or controlled by their flippant owners and get into a lot of trouble with bites, but they are also often treated differently by the legal system than are Pits. Many cities have breed specific legislation requiring the immediate execution of Pits, while offering second chances for other breeds. Thanks to the media's influence, people have become radicalized against Pits, and are more likely to report bites from Pits, even if no actual bite has occurred. I have dealt with this first hand, it's infuriating. It's like how SJWs call rape when a man looks at her "with intent". Something else to consider, I've found that when a Pit bites, it's more likely to do more damage than a less burly breed, they are just really strong and committed. They do less bite-release-bite-release, and more bite-hold-shake. The former leaves punctures and some tearing, the latter shreds flesh down to the bone. This isn't to say that a Golden (or whatever) isn't capable of inflicting serious trauma, it's just more likely from a Pit or other Bully breed. Ever look inside an English Bulldog's mouth? It's the stuff of nightmares.
Also, Pits are victims of systemic black irresponsibility, they are victims of thug life. Just like with guns, responsibility is the difference between owning dogs safely, keeping them from hurting others, and owning dogs recklessly, by not training them, and not keeping them out of trouble.
Also also, I guarantee that those stats you've presented include bites occurring when the dog was rightfully defending it's owner and/or it's owner's property, just like how "gun death" stats include suicides, which more than double the figure. Just a little typical statistical tinkering to push the disarmament agenda. So maybe in this way, I am trying to dispute Time's stats, but I don't have the figures, just a theory.
I'd like to see some stats about what percent of pits are owned by Blacks and Hispanics, and what percent of Pits, and dogs in general, that bite are owned by Blacks and Hispanics. And I'd like to see that same stats for Whites and Asians.
[–] Spacehuman ago
Those statistics you've given are about pit bulls are balled faced lies. I hate when people spout this shit. I've done extensive research beyond your tabloid bullshit and the dog breed is far less likely to bite humans that many popular breeds including labs.
[–] Damndirtyape [S] ago
Are you talking about reported vs unreported bites? Also read through my other comments. I'm not breedist
[–] Spacehuman ago (edited ago)
I concede that this breed is often chosen by many people who should never own a dog and they are mistreated and abused more than other breeds and that will effect it's behavior. But I think they cause less trouble than other breeds would if put in that position.
As to inflation, any dog of questionable breed and flattish face is thrown in as 'pit-bull mix' and that gets put into the pit bull category vastly inflating the bite numbers for the breed. As to natural temperament as a breed pit bulls are more likely to be dog aggressive but far less likely to be human aggressive. This is due to their fighting past where you needed a dog that would not turn and bit it's handler when being separated during a fight. (They would kill any dog who showed inclination to bite humans). This tended to breed human aggression out of the breed. I think that to turn a pit bull into a dog that attacks people requires a great deal of abuse to the dog. Temperament testing shows over and over that pit bulls are on par with dogs like golden retriever.
The more dangerous breeds are those bred to protect inanimate property from humans. They are bred precisely to be inclined to bite humans without needing to be told to do so. I guess we should be glad that hood rats like pits because if they chose German Shepard's or some other guarding type dog it would be far more dangerous for others.