0
9

[–] Cooner_McCloud 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Pitt bull dogs are to Collie dogs or Chows or Labs or Setters about what niggers are to whites. U are right to point out that it's in the genes, it's in the code, it's in the DNA.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 41 points (+41|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] dildonkers 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOH

0
2

[–] DinduNuffinNohow 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Snap! You got served!

0
0

[–] confused_teabagger ago 

Conversely, It could mean that all those gud boy pit bulls, just grew up in bad neighborhoods? God damn it! SJWs were right!

0
5

[–] YallJusRaycis 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I find that the nicer apartment communities always say "no aggressive breeds." It might not be coincidental that those communities don't have very many negroes either.

0
0

[–] TNDsince83 ago 

I honestly think pits get a bad rap due to people training then to fight. I'm guessing if Great Danes, poodles, or Dalmatians were trained for fights they'd be named as "killer" breeds.

Separately, it's almost an inverse problem. Spooks can't be trained. As the saying goes, you can take the nigger out the jungle but you can't take the jungle out the nigger.

0
2

[–] moki-- 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

nope. they are violent by nature.

0
2

[–] redpilldessert 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

You're right. Certain spiders for example are far more aggressive than other spiders. I think the Brazilian wandering spider counts as one.

0
0

[–] draaaak ago  (edited ago)

Consider who tends to own pits.... dogs mirror the energy of their owners/leaders. It's pack mentality, very similar to mob mentality or tribalism.

I have a pit, and he's never hurt anyone. If I wasn't as dog savvy, wasn't careful about him getting out to roam unattended, and more prone to thug life, he might have a rapsheet.

1
2

[–] Rellik88 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

You do know that a lot of dog breeds look like American Pit bull Terriers? So a lot of bite statistics are falsely claimed as pit bulls when not. Not only that most of these statistics come from news reports. The media never covers golden retriever attacks. Only APBT attacks. So these numbers are biased. Fun fact dog fighting was an America Pro Sport in the 1700s-1800s. Not only did it have rules, but before the fight you hand to check the other dog for cheats like, bad tasting fluids on the coat. So how could you check the other dog, not to mention give a champion game dog medical treatment if they were human aggressive? You can't. APBT were bread to be animal aggressive but human friendly. However Niggers have ruined a lot of APBT by making, breeding them human aggressive. The APBT is the All American dog. The mixture of Old English Bulldogs and Terriers. Im down for hating niggers but lets not bring the greatest dog breed down ok?

0
2

[–] scrimmmy 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This man has the right of it. If anything, niggers have ruined the breeds reputation and bloodline with backyard breeding and general niggering. The little Rasclas dog, the rca logo dog who was Thomas Edisons dog and Helen Kellers dogs were all pits. It used to be called the nanny dog for fuck sake!

0
1

[–] Rellik88 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Teddy Roosevelt even had pits in the White house. They helped him with Mt Lion hunting. Damn we need a prez like that again.

2
-1

[–] draaaak 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago  (edited ago)

I'm not trying to dispute the stats or statements you've posted, but there are some things worth considering, some of which you already hinted at...

The media mostly only reports on bites from specific breeds. A few decades ago it was Dobermans, then it was German Shepherds, then Rottweilers, and now it's Pits. All these dogs have something in common, they are strong, highly intelligent, loyal, and trainable. They excel in these departments more so than most other breeds, which is why they are selected for protection/defense services.

Ever notice how the media likes to demonize firearms every chance they get so they can push the gun control agenda? Well, they seem to do the same thing with dog's used for defense. The way the Pit Bull is portrayed by the media is much like how they use the AK47 to symbolize the "evil" of firearms. And Pits and AKs also have quite a bit in common. They are easily identified by silhouette alone, cheap, rugged, dependable, and powerful. They are the perfect dog for people who need a guard dog, but can't afford a Doberman or a Shepherd, just as the AK is the ideal firearm for the poor, low skilled, and desperate. This comparison is not a criticism of either Pits or AKs, they are both popular for very good reasons.

There are different lists out there of the dog breeds which are guilty of the most bites. It can be hard to find, but I have seen top 10 lists featuring Poodles, Goldens, and Labs in the top 3 spots. Having worked with dogs for several years, I can confirm that these "family" dogs are rarely trained or controlled by their flippant owners and get into a lot of trouble with bites, but they are also often treated differently by the legal system than are Pits. Many cities have breed specific legislation requiring the immediate execution of Pits, while offering second chances for other breeds. Thanks to the media's influence, people have become radicalized against Pits, and are more likely to report bites from Pits, even if no actual bite has occurred. I have dealt with this first hand, it's infuriating. It's like how SJWs call rape when a man looks at her "with intent". Something else to consider, I've found that when a Pit bites, it's more likely to do more damage than a less burly breed, they are just really strong and committed. They do less bite-release-bite-release, and more bite-hold-shake. The former leaves punctures and some tearing, the latter shreds flesh down to the bone. This isn't to say that a Golden (or whatever) isn't capable of inflicting serious trauma, it's just more likely from a Pit or other Bully breed. Ever look inside an English Bulldog's mouth? It's the stuff of nightmares.

Also, Pits are victims of systemic black irresponsibility, they are victims of thug life. Just like with guns, responsibility is the difference between owning dogs safely, keeping them from hurting others, and owning dogs recklessly, by not training them, and not keeping them out of trouble.

Also also, I guarantee that those stats you've presented include bites occurring when the dog was rightfully defending it's owner and/or it's owner's property, just like how "gun death" stats include suicides, which more than double the figure. Just a little typical statistical tinkering to push the disarmament agenda. So maybe in this way, I am trying to dispute Time's stats, but I don't have the figures, just a theory.

I'd like to see some stats about what percent of pits are owned by Blacks and Hispanics, and what percent of Pits, and dogs in general, that bite are owned by Blacks and Hispanics. And I'd like to see that same stats for Whites and Asians.

0
1

[–] RedditDead2005-2015 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You can never use facts and statistics to point out that blacks disproportionately commit more crimes and murders because those things are racist.

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)