0
1

[–] redpilldessert 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Nah, it's just they're kept down by the Labradors, Collies and Alsatians of the world.

0
1

[–] redpilldessert 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Only on here would I expect to see such a post. It's truth of course, but the rest of the world is FAR too blinkered to even consider such a parallel.

Kudos.

0
1

[–] Big_Black_Negro 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Funny most niggers also tend to own dogs like that!

0
1

[–] blackguard19 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The difference is society has accepted the obvious differences among dog breeds and some apartment complexes like mine don't allow aggressive dogs like pit bulls. Pit bull owners bitching about how their pit bull is sweet and their pit pull is nice and would never hurt anyone remind me of liberal nigger apologists.

0
0

[–] Damndirtyape [S] ago 

Pit bulls do have strong bites. Before them Rottweilers were at the top of the list, another nigger favorite. Before you get a dog, you have to know how they act. Mine gets energetic and protective, so I run him a lot and let him socialize with other dogs. If I never did those two things and kept him locked up in the house all day, I can see how he'd get neurotic and lash out at strangers.

0
0

[–] MrNegro ago 

If pit bulls killed and raped as many people as negroes, I would be worried about pit bulls.

Of course, the difference between a rabid negro and a dog is that the dog would be put down as soon as it killed a person but the negro gets a Jew lawyer to get him off.

0
1

[–] Damndirtyape [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The only time I worry about pit bulls is when a nigger is walking it. Of course then, I'm still more worried about the niggers impulse control than the pit bull.

0
0

[–] Spacehuman ago 

Those statistics you've given are about pit bulls are balled faced lies. I hate when people spout this shit. I've done extensive research beyond your tabloid bullshit and the dog breed is far less likely to bite humans that many popular breeds including labs.

0
0

[–] Damndirtyape [S] ago 

Are you talking about reported vs unreported bites? Also read through my other comments. I'm not breedist

0
0

[–] Spacehuman ago  (edited ago)

I concede that this breed is often chosen by many people who should never own a dog and they are mistreated and abused more than other breeds and that will effect it's behavior. But I think they cause less trouble than other breeds would if put in that position.

As to inflation, any dog of questionable breed and flattish face is thrown in as 'pit-bull mix' and that gets put into the pit bull category vastly inflating the bite numbers for the breed. As to natural temperament as a breed pit bulls are more likely to be dog aggressive but far less likely to be human aggressive. This is due to their fighting past where you needed a dog that would not turn and bit it's handler when being separated during a fight. (They would kill any dog who showed inclination to bite humans). This tended to breed human aggression out of the breed. I think that to turn a pit bull into a dog that attacks people requires a great deal of abuse to the dog. Temperament testing shows over and over that pit bulls are on par with dogs like golden retriever.

The more dangerous breeds are those bred to protect inanimate property from humans. They are bred precisely to be inclined to bite humans without needing to be told to do so. I guess we should be glad that hood rats like pits because if they chose German Shepard's or some other guarding type dog it would be far more dangerous for others.